Title: Angry Birds Director: Clay Kaytis and Fergal Reilly Summary: Find out why the birds are so angry. When an island populated by happy, flightless birds is visited by mysterious green piggies, it’s up to three unlike outcasts – Red, Chuck, and Bomb – to figure out what the pigs are up to.
I am absolutely a child at heart. I collect toys, I watch cartoons and I love all things that most kids love. That being said I also realize that there is a huge difference between being a ‘kid’s movie’ and a ‘family movie’. A ‘kid’s movie’ is one that the kids in the audience will really like but the parents that are there are going to find it dull at best and annoying at worst. A ‘family movie’ is one that kids and parents can both enjoy, if not for the same reasons. I didn’t have the best feeling going into Angry Birds because it is based off of a mobile game that reached peak popularity in 2011 that didn’t have much of a story to begin with. You can make a good movie out of anything so I tried to be as positive as possible going in.
Angry Birds feels at least two years too late to the be relevant, with an occasional good joke that they repeat ad nauseum.
Angry Birds tries very hard to find a story to explain the very simple game it’s based on and it isn’t even a very interesting one. Red (Jason Sudeikis) is a bird with anger management issues on an island populated by nothing but happy birds. This all changes when the Pigs arrive and their leader Leonard (Bill Hader) that Red immediately distrusts. You can feel the movie straining to come up with an explanation as to why the birds have a giant slingshot and why they think flinging themselves in it is the best plan of attack. It feels like the movie contrives reason after reason as to why the birds are using the slingshot and then that scene is barely ten minutes long. By that point the movie was mostly over and I had spent the entire time wondering what I was doing there and what was the point of this aside from brand management.
I’m a person that loves a good (or terrible) pun. In fact I would say 90% of my sense of humor are puns so you would think that a movie that is nothing but puns would be hilarious to me. It wasn’t. In fact I don’t think I really had a single laugh out loud moment the entire time. Lines such a ‘pluck my life’ are one of the various different lines that you see in a movie like this. There are jokes but like all jokes the lack of timing ruins everything. The movie doesn’t let a good joke stay long enough for anyone to appreciate and jokes that start off good are held for way too long. There is a scene where the birds going swimming in a lake until they find out it’s basically a toilet and we get like a two minute shot of someone peeing in the water. It goes on and on and on and I wanted to tell the movie ‘we get it’. They were swimming and drinking pee. Let’s move on. There were a bunch of moments like that because no one in this movie understands what a punchline is.
If I didn’t know better I never would have guessed this movie was only ninety-seven minutes long because it felt like an eternity to me. The pacing was strange and, like I said, we were all waiting for the entire point of the movie that never seemed to come. The story was both threadbare and somewhat way too convoluted at the same time. Why did the Pigs come to Bird Island and immediately know that they want to eat the eggs? Have they done this to other islands of birds because these birds think their island is the only island? Why can’t these birds fly? The movie tries to frame itself like a 3D Universal Studios ride as it swung around in insane directions to the point that I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone who gets motion sickness. As for me the 3D gave me a horrible headache.
Angry Birds is movie that tries to have jokes for both kids and adults but both of them fall very short. The movie seems to know that it really only has enough material for a short, so every moment felt like filler. As someone who loves kids movies and makes a lot of bad puns I can’t recommend Angry Birds. There isn’t a single redeemable moment in this entire enterprise aside from watching Angry Birds creators Rovio milk their one franchise to death.
The news recently broke that Academy Award winner Lupita Nyong’o is in talks to co-star alongside Chadwick Boseman in Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther. The report states that her character is currently unknown, but “she will be the Panther’s love interest.”
With that in mind, let’s take a quick look at what character Nyong’o might be playing:
Shuri
Shuri is not one of T’Challa’s love interests; she’s his half-sister. But reports have been wrong before, and Shuri is a fan favorite character from modern Panther lore, so this is still a plausible possibility.
She’s most notable for taking over the Black Panther mantle when T’Challa is taken out of commission. It’s doubtful that the filmmakers would be taking this route so early in the series, but she could still be featured as the warrior princess that she is.
Monica Lynne
Monica Lynne is an American who was T’Challa’s primary love interest since the 1970’s (in terms of comic book publication dates). The two were actually engaged to be married, but Panther called it off abruptly and without explanation. Circumstances continued to pull them together, much to Monica’s chagrin, and they maintained a strained but respectful friendship for years.
She’s an important figure in Black Panther history, but there are far more interesting characters for Nyong’o to portray.
Dora Milaje
The Dora Milaje are a group of female warriors who act as the Black Panther’s personal bodyguards. One was actually featured for a brief moment in Captain America: Civil War.
That’s her on the left. Credit: Marvel Studios
They count as love interests because they are sworn to the Panther, if he so desired them. However T’Challa refuses to take advantage of this relationship (except for one time when he was literally under the influence of the devil), and always keeps it professional.
The Dora Milaje are many in number, but the most notable have been Queen Divine Justice, Okoye, and Nakia (who became the rogue Malice after T’Challa rejected her advances). The current Dora Milaje taking center stage are Aneka and Ayo.
Storm Substitute
T’Challa’s most high profile relationship was with Ororo Munroe, the X-Man known as Storm. The two married and Ororo was Queen of Wakanda for a time, until they split in a rather hostile separation.
Marvel Studios doesn’t own the rights to the X-Men, so they probably can’t use Storm directly (the details are still hazy on how they’re able to use Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver, but let’s assume that they can’t use other mutants in the same way). They may however be able to use a substitute character, like an African Inhuman. It’s possible, but very unlikely.
Malaika
Malaika and T’Challa had a brief love affair that was only featured in a 1988 limited series. She holds very little recognition outside of the most hardcore Black Panther fans, which makes her another unlikely candidate. However, her low profile would give Marvel Studios a lot of creative freedom to work with while staying true to the source material, so she can’t be ruled out completely.
—
Who would you like to see Lupita Nyong’o play? Sound off in the comments below!
Last Saturday’s episode of Outlander, “Best Laid Schemes” threw viewers some curveballs. Viewers can all breathe sighs of relief now that Murtagh has been let in on the origins of Claire’s unique perspective on 18th century life, and, though he’s not my favourite character, I hope that Fergus is in one piece after his off-screen interaction with Captain Jonathan “Black Jack” Randall. I ken ye’ll be needin’ a rrrecap!
Best Laid Schemes – My Recap
Jamie sits alone in his bedroom. Murtagh enters and tells Jamie of Black Jack Randall’s release from the Bastille, reminding him that he needs to train on the broadsword in preparation for his duel with Randall. Jamie tells Murtagh that he’s officially withdrawn his challenge. Murtagh demands an explanation and storms out of the room when Jamie tells him to trust that he has a reasonable explanation. A servant enters as Murtagh leaves and tells Jamie that Claire is at L’Hôpital des Anges.
Claire helps Monsieur Forez prepare a body for burial while he graphically describes the process of drawing and quartering to her. He tells her that he will be performing a number of executions using just this method shortly on a number of “practitioners of the dark arts” and their accomplices. Claire becomes obviously distressed and M. Forez suggests she may find better company in Master Raymond. Claire takes M. Forez’s mention of Master Raymond’s name as a warning. She rushes to Raymond’s shop and tells him he must leave the city immediately. Raymond resists at first but eventually agrees to leave while the King tries to weed out these alleged blasphemers. Raymond thanks Claire for her help and sends Claire on her way saying that they’ll meet again in this life or another.
A somewhat abrupt cut later, we see Jamie rubbing Claire’s feet. They are in their bedroom. Bringing up a very tense conversation from the last episode, Jamie tells Claire that he believes he’s saved her life as many times as she’s saved his, which makes them even. Jamie says he didn’t spare Black Jack’s life because he owed Claire a life. He tells Claire that Frank‘s future existence is his insurance against his own death. If they’re unable to prevent the Battle of Culloden and Jamie dies, he wants Claire to travel back to her own time and return to Frank. She somberly agrees to Jamie’s terms.
The next day Claire mixes up concoctions that will make it look as if the person who has taken it is infected with smallpox. As Claire and Jamie explain to Murtagh, if they can make it look like the shipment of wine that Charles Stuart wants to sell is infected with the virus then they’ll be able to hobble Stuart’s rebellion. Since Stuart will have no way to sell the wine he’ll lose his initial investment and won’t make any money to fund his campaign. Murtagh suggests murdering Stuart instead but Claire reminds him that if they do, they’ll just turn him into a martyr. They test the concoctions out on Jamie and it works with near-immediate results. Murtagh isn’t impressed by the indirect tactics and storms out. Jamie and Claire decide that they have to tell him the truth about “everything.” An explanation montage ensues and after Jamie’s confusing tale has been told Murtagh punches Jamie in the face and tells him he should’ve told him all this in the first place.
The next day, recovered from his simulated bout with smallpox, Claire sends Jamie and Fergus on their ways with the toxic concoctions. Back inside the house, Murtagh questions Claire about the extent of her knowledge of the future. She says she doesn’t know specific events concerning any of them, but that she does know that the Jacobite Rising fails miserably. Murtagh, especially for a man who’s been systematically lied to by his two best friends for the past few months, shows a great deal of empathy for Claire, clasping her hand and saying he wouldn’t want to bear her burden.
After a long ride, Jamie and Fergus arrive at St. Germain‘s warehouse in Le Havre. Fergus, at Jamie’s instruction, stealthily leaves two bottles of wine spiked with Claire’s nauseating mixture and then paints nettle juice into the men’s coats.
Much later, Jamie meets with St. Germain and Stuart at the Maison Elise. Stuart explains that a few of the men employed at St. Germain’s warehouse have been stricken with what Stuart strategically calls, “an unknown illness.” These men have been hidden but will soon be missed. Jamie asks if the harbourmaster has been paid off but St. Germain replies that the harbourmaster is a man of scruples and won’t be bribed. Stuart asks Jamie to transport the wine from St. Germain’s warehouse to his own by carriage, and store it there until he can arrange for a buyer. Jamie agrees and Stuart calls him a loyal patriot. St. Germain demands to accompany Jamie and the wine on the journey from his warehouse to Jamie’s to ensure nothing happens to it. Jamie agrees and says he’ll enjoy the company.
Jamie and Murtagh cook up a plan to stage a false attack on the wine shipment. Murtagh, dressed as a French courtier to cast suspicion on Les Disciples, will set upon the wine shipment with a group of similarly dressed highwaymen. Claire protests the plan and calls it unnecessarily risky, and Jamie does what he can to reassure her while admitting that the plan is risky but necessary. Later, the Frasers lie in bed feeling their unborn baby kicking up a storm inside Claire. Jamie tells the “wee’n” he can’t wait to meet him and then the happy couple does what they do best.
Cut to what appears to be the next night and Claire is over at her friend Louise de La Tour‘s having some wine while de La Tour gossips about her cook’s fling with her maid. Claire drinks while the others talk but eventually can’t restrain herself. She comments on the horrible poverty all around them and suggests that they do something. De La Tour suggests to wide approval that the King ensure that these undesirables be ghettoized. An irate Claire asks for de la Tour’s forgiveness and leaves the party.
At the same time, Jamie, St. Germain, and the wine shipment are on their way from St. Germain’s warehouse to Jamie’s. The carriages are set upon by Murtagh’s masked gang. They encounter some resistance from St. Germain and Murtagh is forced to shoot one of the drivers but they’re are able to pull the false robbery off. While a highwayman holds St. Germain, Murtagh pistol-whips Jamie to make the robbery seem more realistic.
Claire, accompanied by a somewhat distracted Fergus, performs her duties at L’Hôpital des Anges but is ordered by Mother Hildegarde to rest when she sees that Claire is exhausted. Upon Mother Hildegarde’s closer inspection, she finds that Claire is bleeding. Mother Hildegarde ensures Claire that this is normal at this stage of the pregnancy but demands that she stay the night at the hospital. Claire sends Fergus home to alert Jamie.
I lost my wine, I lost my money, and my wig is itchy!
Back at the Maison Elise, St. Germain can’t believe that their shipment being stolen was a coincidence. He insinuates that Jamie was involved in the robbery and Jamie says that false accusations often have dire consequences, calling him Monsieur St. Germain rather than Comte. The two jump to their feet and engage in some posturing but Stuart provides St. Germain some perspective by reminding him that St. Germain himself said that Jamie may have saved his life during the robbery. He tells them that their fighting won’t change anything and describes the magnitude of his failure to reclaim the British throne for his father. Not looking much like a prince at all, he swears he will kill himself before being forced to live in Poland and weeps into his wine.
The next morning Jamie helps himself to a bit of wine and breakfast and Fergus reports that Claire spent the night at L’Hôpital des Anges. Jamie tells Fergus that Murtagh has gone to sell the wine in Portugal and won’t be around for a while. Suzette walks in on breakfast with news that Stuart has refused to pay his substantial bill at Maison Elise and is under threat of arrest. Jamie goes to help Stuart out and Fergus offers to come along.
At Maison Elise, Jamie instructs Fergus to wait for him at the door while he sees to Stuart’s financial difficulty. Instead, Fergus wanders through the brothel and eventually finds an unlocked door. He walks in and we see a familiar redcoat hanging on the coat rack–bad, bad, bad! Fergus explores the room and pockets some perfume. We see a shadow cross behind him and Fergus reacts like a deer in headlights when he turns around to see who just closed the door.
After spending a night at L’Hôpital des Anges, Claire returns home. Suzette tells Claire that Jamie has gone to the woods after getting into a fight with a British officer at Maison Elise. She finds a note on a table that says “I am sorry. I must.” Claire orders a carriage to take her to the woods to find Jamie. Claire’s fishtailing carriage tears down the French boulevards while Claire mutters to herself about Jamie’s promise: she makes it to the woods just in time to catch the end of the duel between Jamie and Black Jack. The two enemies seem pretty evenly matched until Jamie is able to drive his blade below Black Jack’s belt. The emasculating blow dealt, the gendarmerie rush in and, because dueling is illegal in France, arrest the combatants. Claire, apparently going into labour, calls out to Jamie. She instructs her servant to take her to Mother Hildegarde and passes out while Jamie is arrested. Blood flows from both Black Jack’s and Claire’s loins.
Best Laid Schemes – My Critique
There was quite a bit of tension in “Best Laid Schemes,” including Fergus’s planting of Claire’s various potions in St. Germain’s warehouse, Fergus’s being locked in a room with Black Jack, Claire’s apparently going into labour, the staged carriage robbery, Claire’s mad carriage ride to the woods, and Jamie and Black Jack’s duel. As a member of Team Frank and a fan of rational causality, I’m a bit concerned. I suppose we’ll have to wait and see how Frank’s future existence is possible. Featured in Season 2’s first episode (a framing device that sets the events of this season up as a flashback Claire is experiencing in the 20th century), viewers, if not Claire and her 18th-century pals, know Frank will live.
I’m glad that “Best Laid Schemes” pushed Black Jack back into the villain spotlight. St. Germain, though a thoroughly ill-mannered snoot, doesn’t provide the same brooding evil that Black Jack Randall does. I hope, though, that it doesn’t turn out that Black Jack has raped Fergus. That would be a bit much even for the monster we know Black Jack to be.
“Best Laid Schemes” seems to confirm what’s obvious to anyone who watched Season 2’s first episode: the child Claire asks Frank to help raise obviously isn’t the same one she’s pregnant with in “Best Laid Schemes.” If Claire is meant to be going into labour at the end of “Best Laid Schemes,” how could she still be pregnant when she sees Frank in the future? Or, if she isn’t going into labour, Claire is about as big as pregnant women get in “Best Laid Schemes” but doesn’t show any belly at all in Season 2’s premiere.
“Best Laid Schemes” was a bit disorienting at times. The frequency of cuts and indistinct periods of time between scenes gave the episode a disconnected feeling. But, there was some great acting in “Best Laid Schemes,” especially from Andrew Gower as Charles Stuart. His downfall complete, the Pretender became more than the fop he’s been since we met him. With the weight of an unfulfilled holy destiny resting on his shoulders, he seemed more like a frightened boy than an arrogant prig.
No wonder people always accuse Hollywood of running out of ideas.
Sony Pictures and Rovio Entertainment are set to release the animated feature, The Angry Birds Movie, this Friday. Angry Birds is an app that is wildly popular. While there is no denying the addictive nature of the game, one has to question how a full-length feature film is born from a game with little to no backstory? With a game like Assassins Creed, there is at least a background story in that game which provides plenty of source material for the screenwriters. In Angry Birds, a bunch of greedy pigs are trying to steal the eggs of these birds. How does that translate into a 97 minutes animated feature film? Perhaps proper storytelling?
Unfortunately, the only thing proper about this story telling is it has a beginning, middle, and an end. Joe Vitti, a writer on The Simpsons, constructed an origin story that concentrates more on being witty and less on being entertaining. Vitti has countless scenes filled with pop culture references and inside jokes but nothing that even approaches being funny. On The Simpsons, the backstory has long been established so he can write those edgy pop culture references in certain scenes. It is as if Rovio Entertainment hired Joe Vitti and said: “Okay here’s our app, now make it into a movie.” So instead of slaving away and constructing some acceptable narrative, he just crowbarred the exact premise of the app into the film. Why even make this movie?
A positive note could take from this film is the top-flight voice talent assembled. Jason Sudeikis, Josh Gad, Danny Mcbride, Bill Hader, Tony Hale, Kate McKinnon, Hannibal Burress, and Maya Rudolph all have voice characters in The Angry Birds Movie. What’s confounding to is that they are not even allowed to spread their comedic wings. Vitti has created characters that are entirely one dimensional and don’t afford these gifted actors an opportunity to use their talents. Imagine if Robin Williams was told to stick to the script in Aladdin and not allowed to use his talents? Part of what provides these animated characters their depth is the actors performances, without this performance, then these characters are nothing but flat.
The animators attempt to provide that missing depth in the overall look of these birds. Each of the birds are different size spherical shapes, they have expressive eyes, and possess different feather textures which provide more characterization than any performance in this film. They attempt to get ramp up the creativity by experimenting with 2-D and time lapse stylings, but the attempt ends up being more of a distraction than anything that would add to the film.
Then, of course, there is an endless number of pop culture references shoved into this story. While Red (Jason Sudeikis) is running around in the Pig Castle looking for the missing eggs, he opens a door to a corridor, and two twin pigs respond with “redrum.” While trying to escape the castle they see a book belonging to King Mudbeard (Bill Hader) entitled ’50 Shades Of Ham.’ Are these references meant for kids? What’s the point of even including them in this animated feature?
Sometimes when a film tries to be too funny, it completely misses the mark.
We’re going to see the playful and deadly sides of Harley Quinn’s persona
Looks like we’re going to see more of the Joker’s favourite harlequin on the big screen.
According to the Hollywood Reporter, ‘Suicide Squad’ actress Margot Robbie has signed a deal to reprise her role as Harley Quinn in a new movie for Warner Brothers. During pre-production of ‘Suicide Squad’, the Australian actress conducted research with the source material and fell in love with the comics. From there, she became a driving force behind the project. It has been reported Robbie hired a writer to work on a script, which was approved by Warners and DC Entertainment.
Comic fans should note that this is not going to be a Harley spin-off. While the plot details haven’t been released, it is believed the film will focus on several female heroes and villains in the DC Extended Universe.
Look out theatregoers, the Birds of Prey might be on the silver screen
One cannot help but wonder if this project sounds similar to ‘Birds of Prey’. The comic series focused on a group of female vigilantes, including Barbara Gordon, Helena Bertinelli (Black Canary), and Dinah Lance (Black Canary). In 2003, there was a television series titled ‘Birds of Prey’ that lasted one season. The line-up consisted of Oracle, a new Huntress who was the daughter of Batman, and a reimagined Black Canary.
Kevin Smith has stated he is in the works to develop a television series based on the 1984 cult classic, The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai Across the Eighth Dimension. Now some of you are no doubt think, “What is Buckaroo Banzai?” Fair question.
Buckaroo Banzai follows the adventures of this intrepid scientist, rock star, samurai, and general badass, played by Frank Weller in the film. His entourage of wildcards include Jeff Goldblum (pre-alien invasions and dinosuars), Clancy Brown (pre-Mr. Krabs), and Ellen Barkin. John Lithgow plays one of antagonists plaguing Banzai throughout the film after Banzai discovers an alternate dimension. This unwillingly invites aliens to invade his own world. And given his ability to see through the creature’s human disguise, he and his cohorts fight against the invasion in a pure 80’s fashion.
Credit: MGM Studios
I’ve seen the film and I am stoked to see it coming to the small screen. It’s a pure adventure romp that doesn’t take itself too seriously. Something a lot of series and movies either shy away from, or botch terrifically. But seeing Smith’s name on the project does assuage many concerns when such news comes down the pipeline.
Especially since there is a strong possibility of the sequel, Buckaroo Banzai Against the World Crime League, actually coming to fruition. Though that also implies the show makes it past the first season, which is becoming a miracle in and of itself given recent years.
Credit: MGM Studios
Smith, himself a fan of the original film, is eager to get the ball rolling on putting the series on the air. Smith has even noted his desire to bringing in cast of the original film to help convey the original spark that’s made it last over the decades. He has also wanted to contact the screenwriter, Earl Mac Rauch, to ensure the film’s spirit is translated properly during the adaptation process.
In the spring of 2012, at some event that Nickelodeon was holding, Michael Bay, talking about how realistic the Ninja Turtles were going to be in the reboot that he was producing, let it slip that they were going to be “from an alien race.” This caused probably one of the biggest blasts of nerd rage that I have ever seen on the Internet, because this was one of the biggest changes that Hollywood has ever attempted for such a beloved franchise. Making the Teenage MUTANT Ninja Turtles aliens was like making Superman a mutant instead of being from an alien race. Sure, Spider-Man had webs coming out of his actual wrists at one point, and the X-Men are supposed to have more colorful costumes, but never was an origin messed with so thoroughly and by the man who directed the worst genre film in 20 years with Revenge of the Fallen.
He thinks it’s an Oscar.
Two years later, the film actually came out. Ironically, the one word in the title that the movie ignored was not ‘mutant’, but ‘ninja’. The turtles themselves were hulking monstrosities, unable to hide anywhere (at least not believably). They knocked people into walls like four green (sorry to overuse the word) hulks. And when Splinter starts telling the origin story, he tells April that he doesn’t remember where he was before the lab that mutated him. No Hamato Yoshi. No “fifteen years ago, I lived in Japan”. The absurdity of this mutant rat learning ninjitsu from a book was only the icing on the cake after cutting out Splinter’s decade and a half long vendetta against Shredder. It was cool to see him kick Shredder’s butt, even using his tail, but the drama of their confrontation was severed by the poor use of the backstory.
And then there was Shredder himself. Asian character “whitewashing” has gotten a lot of press lately after the Doctor Strange trailer, but early in the production of the 2014 TMNT film, they cast William Fichtner as the traditionally Japanese Shredder. Great actor. Bank manager from The Dark Knight. Not Asian. When the film came out, a lot of people were wondering why William Fichtner played some new character, a scientist named Eric Sachs, instead of familiar TMNT scientist Baxter Stockman. True, Stockman was black in the comics, but he was white in the cartoon, which most of this movie borrowed from.
“I get to be Shredder now?”
Well, Eric Sachs sounds like Oroku Saki, Shredder’s real name, which was the original plan, having Fichtner/Eric Sachs be Shredder. Paying attention to the terrible editing of this film (its’ on Hulu now), one can see how sloppily shoehorned into the movie the scenes with the “real” (Asian) Shredder truly were. It was obvious that they intended Eric to be Shredder originally and did a bunch of reshoots to change it. This included a final fight scene for Eric while Shredder is fighting the turtles that they originally wouldn’t need if Eric was Shredder and fighting the turtles. It’s very anti-climactic. The main villain of this movie, who is not Shredder, gets knocked out, and we never see him again while the Turtles fight Shredder, a character that the story did not center around at all. They could have salvaged Eric’s role in the film by having Krang/an Utrom crawl out of his stomach after he was knocked out (or in a post-credits scene). But apparently, no one who worked on this film is as creative or knows TMNT as well as I do.
“Yes! Bring us ALL the William Fichtners!”
Now, we are a month away from the sequel, entitled Out of the Shadows. We have seen a few trailers. I grew up on the 80’s cartoon series, so I am looking forward to seeing Bebop, Rocksteady, Krang and the Technodrome on the big screen (alongside an Asian Shredder). I like the new Turtle van, as opposed to the turtle van in the last scene of the last movie, where the turtles were too big to fit in it, and it looked stupid. And I like the idea of purple ooze.
Old-school TMNT fans know that originally, the ooze mutated animals. Only when the 1987 cartoon wanted to omit Splinter’s murder-filled backstory (from the grittier indie comic book) did they explain that the ooze could turn humans like Hamato Yoshi into animals like rats. And that ooze was purple. I like that they are making that distinction between the green and purple ooze in this film with Bebop and Rocksteady. And the idea of the turtles wanting to become humans so that they don’t have to hide anymore is an interesting concept, especially the way they were scolded for dancing with Vanilla Ice at the end of Secret of the Ooze.
“Vanilla ice? Seriously?”
But I’ve always felt that the best versions of TMNT (rose-colored nostalgia glasses aside) were ones that combine the serious tone of the indie comic with the humor from the 1987 cartoon, balancing it the way Marvel does with their stuff. (Example: the 1990 movie, the 2003 cartoon series, the 2012 Nick cartoon, the new IDW comics). The trailer for this new film does seem to be catering to fans of the cartoon when combining elements (again, like Marvel) does create the richer world that Michael Bay erroneously promised us that the 2014 reboot would be. What do you think? Do you have high hopes for Out of the Shadows? Did you trade in your TMNT fan card by liking the last film? Is this the one franchise that you wish they would reboot? Comment below.
Transgender Actress Laverne Cox To Star In New CBS Legal Drama ‘Doubt’.
Amidst all the debate about trans folk that clouds the news or your Facebook feed, thankfully we have actress Laverne Cox making headlines in a positive way. It was announced this week by CBS that Laverne will be starring in a new legal drama coming this year titled ‘Doubt‘. This marks the first time a broadcast TV series will have a transgender person playing a recurring transgender character.
The show will now star Katherine Heigl & Steven Pasquale as they are replacing the actors who starred in the original pilot episode. The only person to star in this new pilot and the first pilot is Laverne Cox. Cox will play an Ivy League lawyer named Cameron Wirth. The main story focuses on Heigl’s character and the relationship between one of her potentially guilty clients (Pasquale). I’d imagine Laverne’s character will play one of lawyers in the boutique firm that Heigl’s character runs.
This is also the second time that Laverne Cox will be on a major network this year. She’s been preparing to take on the iconic role of Dr. Frank-N-Furter in Fox’s ‘Rocky Horror Picture Show‘. With roles on Netflix, CBS, and Fox as well as major films, Cox is covering all sides of the entertainment industry.
With the addition of ‘Doubt‘, the 2016-2017 CBS season continues to grow. It joins other shows that include reboots of ‘MacGyver‘ and ‘Training Day‘; Matt LeBlanc’s ‘Man With a Plan‘; and Joel McHale’s ‘The Great Indoors‘.
The news is out, Supergirl will be getting a much-deserved season 2. The catch is she and her crew will be flying over to the CW. While the move to the smaller network might at first seem like a demotion, it’s actually good news. The maid of might was never a great fit for CBS. Here’s why she’ll fly higher in her new network home.
We get to see more Supergirl. Sure Supergirl season 1 wasn’t perfect, but the show has a lot of heart and good fun pure adventure moments. It will be great to see how they take the characters in season 2 and beyond. Hopefully, the CW will help the stress the fun and adventure.
The CW, which is becoming the DC channel, understands the superhero genre. Yeah sure CBS is the C part of the CW, and the head of CBS controls programming for the CW, but it’s still a better fit. The lesser powers that be at CW seem to relate to comics better than those CBS. As does their basic fan base. Hopefully, this will lead to a Supergirl that is more super. For instance, as stated in the dc.wiki.com Superman and Supergirl have no need to breathe and can travel faster than light when in space. She should not be threatened by quicksand or even flying in space. Plus, yeah while it was nice to be saved by “everyday people” Supergirl should never be saved by a hose and water.
Less pressure and more flexibility at the CW. The CW doesn’t demand “Big Bang” or “NCIS” numbers. This is the home (well with the WB) where Smallville ran for ten seasons, and Supernatural has run for a dozen seasons despite neither of them being a “Nielsen hit”. Supergirl was CBS’s second-highest rated new show with a 2.4 rating in that coveted 18-49 demographic. Still, that wasn’t good enough for them. If CBS had owned Supergirl, they probably would have kept the show. The $3 million licensing fee CBS had to pay made Supergirl a bit too expensive for their tastes. There will be none of that at the CW.
We will get to see more cross-overs. Now that Supergirl is shooting in Vancouver with ‘The Flash,’ ‘Arrow,’ and ‘DC’s Legends of Tomorrow,’ it should make cross-overs much easier to do. Ideally, they would still keep Supergirl in her own world. After what just went down in Arrow with Dark dropping a nuclear weapon, it’s hard to believe that could happen in a world that has Supergirl or Superman. Also hope they don’t go overboard with guest visit cross-overs. Still a couple a season could make for good television. For instance Vibe meeting Martian Manhunter has amusing written all over it. Gee, with Supergirl, Flash, Arrow, Atom, Martian Manhunter we have the making of an excellent Justice League. Can a Green Lantern be far behind?
We get a full season 22 episode order. The writers and crew know from the start they will have 22 episodes to explore and expand on the world they built-in season one. Thus allowing them to plan accordingly. Who knows they may even figure out how to deal with the Superman issue.
Since the Angry Birds game release in 2009 it has become a pop-culture phenomenon. The game being downloaded 12 million times within ten months. It has been licensed to be made into toys and theme park attractions, been turned into a Finnish TV series and now made into a Hollywood film. But can a simple game be made into a compelling movie?
Red (Jason Sudeikis) is a short-tempered bird who lives in a tropical paradise. But after one incident too many Red is sentenced to anger management, spending his free time with the other misfit birds – Chuck (Josh Gad), a super-fast, inpatient bird, Bomb (Danny McBride) who blows up if upset or startled and Terence (Sean Penn) a very menacing large bird that doesn’t say much. When the pigs lead by Leonard (Bill Hader) land on the bird island he offers the hand of friendship, Red is the only bird who does not trust the new visitors and along with Chuck and Bomb, Red sets out to find the legendary Mighty Eagle to figure out how to get rid of the green-skinned swine.
Video games have a notorious reputation for being poorly translated onto the big screen. Even the best adaptations like Prince of Persia, Mortal Kombat and Silent Hill are either bang-average or only obtain a cult audience. Angry Birds has a thin premise, some limbless birds being flung at poorly constructed buildings to kill some limbless pigs. This shows in the movie as it tries to pad itself to run over 90 minutes. The movie has to use a number of montages and fantasy cutaways to extend itself – which proves that this product was devoid of ideas. Once or twice is okay but the movie relies on these techniques too much.
The Angry Birds Movie was written by Jon Vitti who has an impressive TV resume working on shows like The Simpsons, The Critic and the American version of The Office. But his filmography is not something to shout about – the only movies he has worked on being two Alvin and the Chipmunks sequels. Vitti and directors Clay Kaytis and Fergal Reilly (making their directional debut) give the movie a Looney Toons, slapstick – characters can shake off explosions to the face and be thrown into buildings without much problem. But because of the thin story, the movie would have worked better as a series of shorts than a feature film. The movie also suffers the curse that inflicts a lot of family movies – a reliance on using pop-culture gags that will date the movie quickly – such as references to photobombing, Instagram and things like Fifty Shades of Grey. The movie references The Shining, something that younger members of the audience are not likely to know. These sort of things are just lazy attempts to appeal to the adults in the audiences.
Red’s story arch is a little like Shrek in his first movie – he is an outsider who lives away from the rest of society and loses his home because of some outside force. Like the green ogre Red has anger issues and The Angry Birds Movie shares the Shrek movies fondness for pop culture humor.
The Angry Birds Movie does have an impressive voice cast and despite the film being a blatant cash-grab, the actors actually put effort into their performances. The main trio were perfectly fine, Sudeikis being the put-upon Red but still being sardonic, Gad has form playing animated characters – this time being a maniac but annoying ball of energy and McBride was a loveable lug. Peter Dinklage was a fun presence as the egotistical Mighty Eagle – he was basically a Zapp Branagan like figure and Dinklage was a lot more committed to playing the bird than he was playing a robot in Destiny. Maya Rudolph was the other major actor, playing a good-natured hippie who finds it difficult to deal with Red’s cynicism. Rudolph has some decent comedic timing, but the character was unremarkable.
The animation is of a good standard – it was bright and colorful, and there is great detail on the birds with their feathers. It was fluid, working particularly well when the movie is like the game where the birds are slingshot at the pigs’ hometown. It’s not Pixar or Dreamworks level, but there was talent that worked on the movie. The animation on the pigs was the weak point because they looked too smooth and simple compared to the details on the birds.
The Angry Birds Movie is a cash-in that has come too late: Angry Birds has passed the peak of its popularity. The film adaptation could easily have been a lot worst considering the flimsy source material, but there was some effort put into the production. In the end, this is a movie that has little reason or merit for it to exist.
