Jurassic Park is one of, if not, my all-time favorite movie, but I had never read the book which has always hung over me like a dark cloud. So in honor of the big-budget dinosaur flick making its way onto Netflix this month, I picked up the Michael Crichton classic and dug in on some dinosaur action!
I don’t expect the books and the movies to be exactly the same. Obviously, a lot the book is not going to make it to the big screen, often for the better. But it’s fun to compare the books to the movies especially when the movie is better (I’m looking at you Bourne Identity and every James Bond movie).
So if you’ve never read Jurassic Park or it’s been a while since you basked in the glory that is Jeff Goldblum in a mostly-open shirt here are the five biggest ways it differs from the movie.
5. Hammond is a Bastard
If you’ve only seen the movie you think of John Hammond as the Santa Claus lookalike who delivers dinosaurs instead of presents. Richard Attenborough’s character is a rich guy, who despite creating the world’s deadliest zoo, mostly had good intentions. Even admitting that he no longer endorses Jurassic Park by the end of the movie.
Hammond in the book is a bastard. He believes in his park, no matter what evidence is presented to him showing how dangerous it is. He is ruthless putting his own grandchildren in harm’s way just to prove that kids will love his park. Hammond sees his employees as replaceable parts and blames their lack of “vision” for all the park’s problems. Even after the dino disaster is over, he begins plotting how to make his next park better. His comeuppance was much deserved.



