Home Blog Page 1295

We Need More Patrick Wilson: His 5 Best Films

Monkeys Fighting Robots

Patrick Wilson is one of the finest actors working today, honest to God he is. He is a personality chameleon, able to garner sympathy from the biggest of scumbags, or pity from heroes. He can be a charmer in an indie picture, a leading man in a blockbuster, it doesn’t matter to him. The problem is, the guy just doesn’t show up in as many films as some of his peers. Now, if you look deep enough you can occasionally spot a VOD release from Wilson, but as far as marketable cinema, we simply need more Patrick Wilson.

Here are his five greatest films:

Patrick Wilson

5. Bone Tomahawk – S. Craig Zahler’s brilliant 2015 western/horror was a terrific example of genre mashup and an unbelievable cast playing off one another to perfection. Patrick Wilson plays Arthur, the town doctor whose wife is kidnapped by a tribe of cannibals. Despite having his broken leg in a splint, Arthur is determined to track down the savages with Sheriff Hunt (Kurt Russell and his mustache), Richard Jenkins’ Chicory, and Matthew Fox’s Brooder.

As a straight genre role, Wilson uses his universal charm and determination to hold his own against Russell and Jenkins. He also has the toughest task here, given his broken leg in the story, and it allows Wilson to show off the more physical side of his acting talents.

Patrick Wilson

4. The Conjuring – James Wan’s house of horrors throwback is terrific for a number of reasons. It hearkens back to a classic “haunting” tale, it has genuine scares, and an ensemble that includes Llili Taylor, Ron Livingston, and Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga as Ed and Lorraine Warren, real-life paranormal investigators. Wilson is again part of an ensemble, and his work here and in Wan’s Insidious serves similar purposes. But as a film surrounding Wilson and Co., The Conjuring has the slight edge.

Patrick Wilson

3. Hard Candy – This disturbing little gem from the mid 2000s put Patrick Wilson – and his costar Ellen Page – on the cinematic map. Here, Wilson plays Jeff, a photographer who meets a young girl online and invites her back to his home for “a photo shoot.” And by young, we’re talking fifteen. Hard Candy subverts expectations early on when Page’s Hayley turns the tables on Jeff and things grow increasingly dark as the story plummets to its nihilistic conclusion.

This is Wilson showing off his finest talent: the ability to squeeze every last ounce of sympathy from unsympathetic characters. Jeff is a scumbag, at least we think he is, but Wilson’s desperate portrayal and insistence that he’s an innocent photographer begin to work on the audience. Is he really a monster? We’re pretty sure, but not totally sure, and that’s because of Wilson’s dedicated performance.

Patrick Wilson

2. Watchmen – Another ensemble story, Zack Snyder’s (only good) comic-book adaptation was a polarizing but ambitious story. Spanning decades, and existing in an alternate 1980s that makes the dystopian 1985 from Back to The Future II look like a walk in the park, Watchmen has terrific performances top to bottom. Jackie Earle Haley’s Rorschach nabs most of the accolades here, but Patrick Wilson’s Dan Dreiberg is an exercise in nuance in a film not that committed to such subtlety.

Dreiberg is formerly Nite Owl – a sort of Batman cover band – but in the story of Watchmen Dreiberg has hung up his cape and cowl. He’s pudgy, timid, emasculated, but when the time comes he slips into the costume once again with great zeal. Dreiberg is the audience’s inroad to the film, the only former superhero who seems to be a truly good person, and Wilson’s performance is vital in bringing humanity to the film.

Patrick Wilson

1. Little Children – If Hard Candy put Patrick Wilson on the map, Little Children proved he had the ability to carry an honest adult story. In Todd Field’s suburban melodrama, Wilson plays Brad “The Prom King” Adamson, the object of lust for desperate housewives who falls into an affair with Kate Winslet’s Ruth. Brad is an Adonis drifting aimlessly through this landscape of dissolved dreams. He’s reluctant to let go of his former glory, opting for late-night football and watching skateboarders over studying for his BAR exam.

While the story veers into disturbing subject matter with a subplot involving a sex offender ruffling feathers in the neighborhood (Jackie Earle Haley, owning again), this remains the story of Wilson’s Brad and Winslet’s Ruth. It’s a terrific display of Wilson’s good looks, his smarmy jock persona, and once again his ability to garner sympathy where there should be none.

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

The Top 5 Horror Films Of 2006, Which One Is Your Favorite?

Monkeys Fighting Robots

Some fans complain that the mid 2000’s seem a little barren. True, very few years can match the success of horror’s late 70’s to mid 80’s run. However, I honestly believe if you dig around enough you can easily secure enough valid entries to mold an interesting and debatable top 5 list for any year. Let’s start with 5 fun fright films celebrating their 10th anniversaries in 2016.

5. Slither

This creature feature stars Nathan Fillion and the incredibly eye-catching Elizabeth Banks. Slither is a throwback film with a nostalgic 80’s double feature feel. A fantastic early effort from Hollywood heavyweight James Gunn that almost perfectly balances the absolute ridiculous and gooey monster filled fun. All though it sometimes skirts close to former genre staples like David Cronenberg’s 70’s masterpiece Shivers, it always feels like a well crafted mix of originality and homage. 6.7/10

4. Silent Hill

Not everyone’s cup of tea but this 2006 supernatural horror film based on the iconic game of the same title, maintains a large and active fan base visible on social media and every major horror event I attend. A more than serviceable cast including Radha Mitchell and Sean Bean add substance to this beautiful shot nightmare. Some of horror’s most visually exciting creatures live in this hellish town of mystery and madness. 6.9/10

3.  Behind The Mask: The Rise Of Leslie Vernon

A fan favorite that came out of nowhere 10 years ago and had old school horror hounds making the obligatory “Have you seen this yet?” phone calls. A decade later it holds up well as a smart and creative take on the slasher sub-genre. Leslie is calculated, nice and deadly. He validates his predecessors before lulling us into an entertaining and memorable finale. One question remains, all these years and no sequel? Leslie has potential to join the greats, he just need another outing or two. 7.1/10.

2. Black Christmas

There’s not a better looking slasher gore film on this list. It strays from the 70’s classic enough to make it worth watching on its own merit. A superb cast of young and veteran actresses including Katie Cassidy, Michelle Trachtenberg, Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Lacey Chabert offer better than average horror movie performances. The top-notch cast combined with the many great kill scenes, make the 2006 version of Black Christmas and it’s 1974  original, a perfect holiday double feature. It’s a remake and some won’t appreciate that but. it’s one of my 14-year-old daughters favorite yuletide watches and it seems to be a classic for that upcoming generation of fans. 7.4/10.

1. The Hills Have Eyes

Yes, another remake, and our top entry at that. Shame on us. However, you have to confess this amazing vision of terror from original creator Wes Craven (R.I.P.) and talented French filmmaker Alexandre Aja is truly unforgettable, all over again. The ultimate examination of a suburban family’s fight for life against a forgotten clan’s brutality and guerrilla warfare tactics. The bloody opus is redone at pitch perfect tone. Including the original version’s intensity and uncomfortable sequences designed to make the viewer throw their preconceived notions of horror on film completely out the window. 8/10.

That’s all for now Horror Hounds. Don’t forget to vote for your favorites in the comment section, or feel free to leave your own top 5 list from 2006. Come see me at The Horror Hound Page & Group on Facebook. We’ll be back next week with our top 5 horror films of 2001 (15 years ago) to discuss with all you fans out there. See us then.

 

 

 

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

‘The Conjuring 2’ Is All Jumps Scares And No Originality

Monkeys Fighting Robots

‘Conjuring 2’ Proves If You’ve Seen One Haunting Then You’ve Seen Them All

While the supernatural scares are always popular with American horror audiences, ‘The Conjuring 2‘ shows how tired this genre is becoming.

The sequel to 2013’s ‘The Conjuring‘ follows the returning Ed and Lorraine Warren (Patrick Wilson & Vera Farmiga) as they reluctantly take on another haunting. This time in gloomy North London. After dealing with the infamous Amityville case, the pair want a break. The paranormal activity that haunts the English family is enough to bring them out for one last investigation.

Conjuring 2

My biggest gripe with the film is the unoriginal plot being based around jump scares. I’ve never noticed how lazy these supernatural moments come off until you see doors being locked just for some weak tension. If the film focused more on original elements and less on cliches, it would have been a far more entertaining experience. ‘Conjuring 2‘ felt like a carbon-copy of the first film.

And who was asking for that pointless scene of Patrick Wilson singing Elvis? The whole theater was on the edge of their seat for that…

It isn’t all negative though. There was a scene with a creepy painting that unnerved me. Very rarely can a scare be built that well and this was a great example of how to do it. The film needs far more inventive new spooks like that.

Also the acting from everyone involved was so honest. The fear was believable, the humor was natural, and the chemistry between Wilson & Farmiga is undeniable.

Conjuring 2′ isn’t downright deplorable but needs to change its ways. Director James Wan (Saw, Insidious, Furious 7, Aquaman) has banked on his horror formula for years now. If he wants to make impactful genre pieces though, there has to be some sort of re-invention within this supernatural horror genre.

Do you agree with my review? Will you be seeing ‘The Conjuring 2‘?

Let me know in the comments below!

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

*SPOILERS* First Look At Doctor Strange LEGO Set

Monkeys Fighting Robots

LEGO is probably the worst offender in the toy market when it comes to spoiling movies. While they aren’t always accurate they can sometimes ruin major surprises such as Giant Man in Captain America: Civil War. This new set for the upcoming Doctor Strange shows us a number of things such a Wong taking flight with fans, a look at the Sanctum Sanctorum, and Doctor Strange and Baron Mordo fighting some sort of monster coming out of the wall.

The set doesn’t reveal any other details; we don’t know who is in control of this monster or where it comes from. This seems like a detail that could be seen in the next trailer but there is no way of knowing for sure. As always if you want to be spoiler free for Marvel movies it’s best not to collect LEGO.

Doctor Strange comes out November 4, 2017 and is directed by Scott Derrickson.

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

Scoring Anime is Hard… Sometimes

Monkeys Fighting Robots

Its been a while since I’ve done a rant post…right? And of course it wouldn’t be one of my signature rant posts unless it was a topic that 99% of people don’t really seem to care about or even think about. So today I’m going to bring up the issue about how to rate a show. Mostly I want this to be helpful, since I think that if you know where you rate something it can make it easier to talk about it to other people and share that kind of stuff. So before I get into how I think you can more accurately score your favorite and least favorite anime, let me give a little context as to why I felt the need to even talk about this stupid topic.

I was listening to a podcast I hate (because I just do things like that). They ended up scoring a show and I heard one of the reviewers talk about how when they score based on objective things from the show and don’t really compare it to other shows. This is completely the wrong way to score something and you won’t get anything out of scoring something this way. I was so mad that someone with a fair bit of influence would say something that no reviewer or critic would ever say. So I felt the need to contact them and get a little more context (still waiting on a response though).

First of all, scores are entirely personal. When you score something it doesn’t have to do with anyone else receiving that piece of work. A score is a personal decision you make to give something you viewed. Of course scores can change over time for good or bad depending on how your viewpoint changes. But there should never be another person trying to influence you scoring something if that isn’t indeed the way you feel about it. Of course someone can argue your views and maybe influence you otherwise, but thats something different entirely. One of the biggest thing I think is bad about people scoring these days is giving things high scores because everyone else thinks it’s a masterpiece except the one scoring it. That’s bullshit, why would you give something you didn’t like a high score? Some would say objective qualities, but I think that holds little value in a review/score.

They always bring up objectivity on that aforementioned podcast, and it sickens me every time. Everything is subjective to a certain extent and art is “almost” always going to get different opinions on what works for different people. Since there are so many different types of people there are countless things that will work or not work for a person when it comes to art/entertainment. So talking about things that are subjective and making them sound objective won’t help anyone who watches your review (except for the extremely gullible and sheepish type). People respond to emotion and tend to connect with other people’s similar emotions. When your review/score something, it’s better to talk about how something made you feel and why it made you feel that way. Then someone can better understand why you would feel that way and may even realize a shared opinion. Any person can read and understand a book on storytelling and blurt out formula’s on what a show succeeded in or not. It takes a true reviewer/critic to understand why something made them feel a certain way. These are the most important reviews and you will find you get more out of these. How a show makes you feel is the only thing that should drive you to watch it. Hence the way a show made you feel should be the biggest consideration when scoring something. Now of course there are a lot of variables when considering how something made you feel and some of it has to do with why. But if you aren’t being true to your feeling about a show, you might as well not score it at all.

Another thing is that an Anime, or any piece of media for that matter, doesn’t exist in a bubble. Some like to act like they don’t compare things when taking into consideration a score or how to feel about a show. This is a lie and nonsense. Scores mean nothing if you don’t have something to compare it to. It doesn’t matter if a show is the worst thing ever to be made, if it exists in this bubble that some people pretend to use, then its always going to be the best. It has to be, because the only thing it has to stand up to is itself. An easier way to look at this is to think of scoring as giving value to shows on a personal level. It’s in out nature to give value to things and not to other things. Because somethings make us feel better than other things, and we are smart enough to tell the difference between those things. Were not monkeys like those people on said podcast that just forget what they’ve watched previously and try to blindly score something with no compass. We have a compass that remembers what we like and why we like, so we should use it.

Like I said before, this topic is completely ridiculous and petty and wont really enhance your anime viewing experience. But I think that if you are more true to the things you like and show that when you talk to other people, the conversations will be better. There will be better understanding of viewpoints, and empathizing, and maybe a little bit of influence towards something you like. Like scores, anime/art is meaningless if we can’t share it with others, and being able to share your opinions honestly is an important tool when you enjoy that art.

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

Sebastian Stan Hints At The Winter Soldier’s Return In Black Panther

Monkeys Fighting Robots

The first end credit scene at the end of Captain America: The Winter Soldier was not the scene that fans were expecting, After two movies of build up and hints many people thought that Bucky would be taking up the shield and becoming Captain America. Instead, Bucky decided to not only willingly freeze himself he does it under the protection of T’Challa in the fictional country of Wakanda.

While on a panel at Wizard World Philadelphia this weekend actor Sebastian Stan was asked about what the next appearance of the Winter Soldier will entail since that scene seems to hint that he will be in Black Panther.

“I don’t know, man. I mean, there’s obviously a very clear answer but I’m not maybe say it, now. Where did he end up at the end of the movie? That’s the movie he should be in. I feel like that would be the natural… But I don’t know.”

It isn’t that surprising that Stan isn’t 100% sure about whether or not he will turn up in the movie but the team up would be an interesting one. T’Challa spent all of Captain America: Civil War trying to kill Bucky only to turn around and not only give him sanctuary but also refer to him as a ‘victim’ which no one in the Marvel universe has done.

The Marvel universe is expanding and with so many characters running around it only makes sense that smaller team-ups would begin to happen. It will make everyone appearing in Avengers: Infinity War a little easier to handle.

Black Panther is due for release on February 16, 2018 and is being directed by Ryan Coogler.

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

Will Jon Hamm Play ‘Archer’ In The Live-Action Film?

Monkeys Fighting Robots

There’s no doubt that the idea of Mad Men star Jon Hamm playing super slapstick spy Sterling Archer enters the realm of dream casting. That being said, it shouldn’t surprise fans to learn that Archer show producers Adam Reed and Matt Thompson have been heavily considering the possibility. Archer recently completed its seventh season and has unfortunately received declining ratings over its past few runs.

During a recent sit down with Daily Beast, Thompson discussed the future of the series and the very real concept of a Archer live-action film adaptation.

In the interview Thompson talks about the growing debate among his team about the project and the inevitable (and likely soon approaching) last season of the animated comedy.

“It’s all up to whatever Adam [Reed] wants, to do, but he and I have definitely talked about it,” stated Thompson. He added the discussion has been an ongoing conversation over the past few seasons. ““We vacillate between if you do it, why are you doing the TV show? And should it be live-action, or should it be cartoon?”

Thompson went on to explain that the crew behind the hit FX series have always had one name in mind as their pick to play Sterling Archer himself. “It’s Jon Hamm. If Archer goes live-action, I do believe it will be Jon Hamm.” The tone of that remark may seem harsh to fans of the animated series given that lead titular character’s spot-on comedic timing is often attributed to the vocal performance  of H. Jon Benjamin. While Benjamin doesn’t exactly fit Sterling’s physical description, it’s hard to imagine any Archer project without him involved.

 

 

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

Cinema Showdown: ‘Boyz n The Hood’ v. ‘Menace II Society’

Monkeys Fighting Robots

This July marks the 25th anniversary of John Singleton’s time-capsule urban drama, Boyz n The Hood. The film was a watershed moment in American cinema, bridging the gap between white moviegoers and the issues plaguing the African-American community in South Central Los Angeles. It shined a (soft-focus) light on the bloodshed, the violence, and the cyclical nature of murder and despair eroding the black neighborhoods from the inside out like a social cancer.

The buzz surrounding Boyz n The Hood played into the hands of Singleton and his film, rife with stars like Ice Cube, Laurence Fishburne, and Cuba Gooding Jr. – who weren’t quite stars yet. It was a massive hit, it launched careers, and it grabbed two Oscar nominations. And, like any vital cultural film, Boyz n The Hood spawned dozens of imitators. Some were okay, others were anything but okay, but one perhaps told the same story even better than Singleton’s film. That was 1993’s Menace II Society.

Directed by the Hughes Brothers, Allen and Albert, Menace II Society was a much more grim, unforgiving look at the road to nowhere young black men were traveling in South Central at the time. The awards weren’t thrown the film’s way, the box office was lighter. But as time, the greatest judge of all, has aged both films, one’s withstood the appreciation process better than the other. Both are monumental films, important glimpses into uncomfortable and distressing swaths of this country, but one is better in just about every way.

The Case for ‘Boyz n The Hood’

The story of Tre Styles, growing up under the watchful and philosophical eye of his father, Furious, is an emotionally engaging if somewhat melodramatic examination of gangs and hopelessness in The Hood. The dynamic between Tre and his friends is the nucleus of the picture. Ice Cube’s Doughboy is the best of a trio of friends that includes Gooding’s Tre and Morris Chestnut as Ricky, the athlete who has a football scholarship waiting for him if only he can make it out alive. Sadly, he cannot, and Ricky’s death is one of the more devastating moments in modern cinema. It’s sad and heartbreaking, and despite the weaknesses of Singleton behind the camera – the framing is off, the melodrama ramped up when it doesn’t need to be – the performances sell the tragedy.

Boyz n The Hood

Boyz n The Hood can also stand on the merits of its cultural impact. Riots and unrest surrounded the release of the film in some areas, and the danger existing in the periphery added a layer of percolating energy to what happened on the screen. As an important film, it’s one of the most important of the 90s. But, as a cinematic experience, Singleton’s direction is just a little off. Everything feels too saccharine in the end. Despite the title card telling us Doughboy doesn’t make it a month after the end of the film, the story forces an upbeat note though it didn’t earn it moments before, when Ricky’s murderers are executed.

The Case for ‘Menace II Society’

Where Boyz n The Hood falls victim to its own desires to be positive in the end, Menace II Society approaches the very same subject matter with a more nihilistic and unforgiving tone. Caine (Tyrin Turner), our “hero” of the film, is not the greatest person. He may be better than his friend, O-Dog (Lorenz Tate), a psychopath who murders an Asian convenience store owner and his wife for basically no real reason (and subsequently shows off the surveillance tape to his friends over and over), but Caine knows his lot in life. Like so many young African-Americans in the 90s, South Central Los Angeles was the end of the world. The horizon stopped at the edge of their streets full of murder and hate, and Caine was a child borne of this place. He’s a drug dealer, he jacks cars, and he gets uneasy when his grandparents bring up God around him.

menace-ii-society-original

All that being said, Caine isn’t a bad kid. It might seem weird to say, but that’s the beauty of the Hughes’ film: not everything is black and white. In Boyz n The Hood, there was a clear delineation between Tre and Doughboy. We are told from the beginning Tre is a wholesome kid stuck in the wrong place. It’s hammered into our head, in fact. Here, nuance is employed. Caine is a product of his environment, shaped by the criminality in his past, in his friendships, and in the inescapable daily life. He does bad things, but we come to understand in the scope of bad shit that goes on, his transgressions are minor. Menace II Society understands to a better degree that there are no clear answers to what ails these young men, and the Tre’s in this world are far less likely than the Caine’s.

As a film experience, Menace II Society buzzes with a ferocity lacking in Singleton’s film. The camera captures the right moments, frames them brilliantly, and the Hughes’ understanding of street culture – a culture they examined to a lesser extent in Dead Presidents and From Hell – brings a pavement-pounding grit. These streets aren’t untouched by the pollution of its characters, like they sometimes are in Singleton’s frame. There is no melodrama here, because melodrama isn’t the right tone to tell these stories.

The Verdict

It isn’t a close race between Boyz n The Hood and Menace II Society when these two pictures are examined back to back. One is a visceral cinematic experience, a brutal and unflinching examination of a world most of us never want to see firsthand. The other, Singleton’s film, is an important film, and a watchable and entertaining movie, but on the basis of cinematic quality and thematic elegance, Menace II Society has aged much better.

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

Superman Arriving To The CW’s ‘Supergirl’

Monkeys Fighting Robots

The Man Of Steel Is Being Cast For ‘Supergirl’ Season 2

Although he’s only appeared as a blur in the first season, it looks like Superman will finally be joining his cousin Supergirl on her show.

Executive producer Andrew Kreisberg was thrilled to announce we will be meeting Clark Kent in season 2 but only for the first two episodes. The Internet is buzzing with casting rumors. A younger Superman played by Daniel DiMaggio was featured on the show before but the newer version will be older. This will be the first TV Superman since Tom Welling in ‘Smallville‘.

Imagine Tom Welling being casted after being on his own super CW show!

Also, this does bring up an interesting point that ‘Arrow‘ chose to not use the Suicide Squad on their show due to their upcoming film but Superman is playing an even bigger role in the DC Extended Universe. With the official statement referring to the Man of Steel as Clark Kent, will we only see Clark on the show?

Who do you think should play Clark Kent a.k.a Superman on ‘Supergirl‘? Let me know in the comments below!

Supergirl returns for season two on Mondays this fall at 8 p.m. on The CW.

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube

Is Kristen Stewarts ‘Personal Shopper’ The Best Thriller Of 2016?

Monkeys Fighting Robots

The new film Personal Shopper starring Kristen Stewart is being hailed by critics and fans as one of the greatest thrillers ever made. It came out of nowhere earlier this year and has gained momentum and buzz ever since its first screening. The movie is written and directed by rising French filmmaker Olivier Assayas. The picture absolutely dominated conversation at the Cannes Film Festival and won the events coveted Best Director prize. It has since caught the eye of several large studios seeking to distribute the new dramatic horror film.

Here’s the plot. A young woman working in France as the personal shopper to a major celebrity becomes stalked by an unseen malevolent force. Is it a ghost from the past, or someone hiding just around the corner?

Personal Shopper is definitely turning heads and getting rave reviews from top critics. Universal has taken notice as Variety reports the major film studio has recently acquired the rights to distribute the film in several territories around the world.

Personally, I can’t wait to see Personal Shopper. Kristen Stewart’s maturation has been impressive since her run as Bella in the Twilight franchise. There’ nothing tween, young adult or kitsch about her current film. Let’s hope this talented young actress continues on her current trajectory for many years to come.

Here’s a look at the trailer for Personal Shopper.

Monkeys Fighting Robots Youtube