Let’s be clear: Halloween is my favorite horror movie of all time. It is the seminal horror film of its era. It put the Slasher genre on the map, seemingly forever. But, with that said, the director of Halloween, John Carpenter, is a master of the filmmaking craft who has created other incredible works of cinema. Carpenter’s signature is distinct and for fans of Stranger Things, half of that show would not exist without John Carpenter.
John Carpenter
Carpenter is the writer, director, composer, and possibly caterer on most all his movies. The wild success of Halloween gave Carpenter the clout to keep doing movies his way. Carpenter went on to direct many more films, including these fun horror flicks to binge watch for Halloween …
The Fog – 1980
You likely remember the 2005 remake with Tom Welling and Maggie Grace, and if you do, I’m sorry. Carpenter made the R-RATED original which reunites Carpenter with “scream queen” Jamie Lee Curtis. The Fog is a chilling folktale of long-overdue revenge. What Carpenter carefully hides in Halloween he puts on full display here. The supernatural force is real and the people of this small town are at its mercy.
Arguably Carpenter’s second most famous film behind Halloween, The Thing is a sequel of sorts (but not really) to the 1951 science fiction classic The Thing From Another World. Starring Kurt Russel, Carpenter weaves a story of paranoia in a supremely isolated location with creepy care. Unlike many movies of today, The Thing features only a handful of whiz-bang effects, but they resonate and disturb, unlike most modern CG gore.
Christine by Carpenter is not mentioned much in horror circles, but pop culture loves the tale of the killer car. Family Guy, Futurama, and beyond have tossed a wink at Carpenter’s movie. Shot using 20 different cars, none of which were actually the 1958 Plymouth Fury the car is supposed to be, Christine is top-notch b-movie fun.
For those who already know this film you might think I’m crazy. Prince of Darkness, in many, MANY ways is not a good movie. But it’s a study in surrealism, a departure from Carpenter’s usual horror style, and the concept of science mixed with classic good versus evil tropes is refreshing. Plus, if you’re doing a Carpenter marathon this Halloween it’s good to have a laugh to break up the terror.
John Carpenter is as divisive a director as they come who by the mid-90s found his cinematic style fading. In the Mouth of Madness is a love letter to H.P. Lovecraft and for that alone the surreal horror images are brilliant. The film’s concept of a writer’s wild mind-affecting reality itself is interesting. However, everything else about the movie, including any sense of a cohesive plot or the awful soundtrack by Carpenter himself, is mediocre at best. Still, fans of horror or Lovecraft will enjoy the imagery and effects.
According to sites like IMDB, They Live is a horror movie. I think it’s a science fiction movie. Instead of debating it, I instead added it as an honorable mention. They Live is an unlikely movie about an unlikely hero in a plot that seems eerily prophetic. Uber-capitalist aliens secretly run the world and use subliminal messaging to get us, stupid humans, to obey … consume … reproduce. John Nada, played by the late, great Rowdy “Roddy” Piper, is a man with nothing. He roams the world looking for work until he finds a purpose … to uncover what the aliens are doing.
Two new TV spots have for surfaced for Doctor Strange, according to ComicBook.com. This makes it thirty-two, probably the highest number of TV spots Marvel Studios has done so far. If he was a more obscure character before, the Sorcerer Supreme is certainly in the public’s mind now. And with mostly positive reactions from last week’s screening for critics and the character’s confirmed appearance in Avengers: Infinity War, it definitely appears the studio has another hit on their hands for their ever-growing Marvel Cinematic Universe. You can watch the two new TV spots below.
Doctor Strange tells the story of neurosurgeon Stephen Strange whose life takes a tragic turn after a horrific car accident damages his hands. When medicine fails him, he is forced to look for healing in a mysterious place known as Kamar-Taj. There he learns that this is not just a place for healing but also the sight of a magical battle to save the world. Soon Doctor Strange must choose to return to his normal life or leave it all behind and take his new place as the world’s Sorcerer Supreme.
Doctor Strange stars Benedict Cumberbatch (Sherlock, Star Into Darkness, ), Chiwetel Ejiofor (12 Years a Slave), Rachel McAdams (True Detective Season 2), Michael Stuhlbarg (A Serious Man), Mads Mikkelsen (Valhalla Riding/Hannibal) and Tilda Swinton (The Grand Budapest Hotel). It is directed by Scott Derrickson, and written by Derrickson, Jon Spaihts (Prometheus), and C. Robert Cargill (Sinister). It opens November 4, 2017, in theaters nationwide.
Ben Affleck is set to play Batman a second time in the upcoming Justice League film, but this is not what makes the newest Batman have trouble sleeping at night. Affleck as Batman has its critics, both positive and negative, but he has apparently done well enough to take over a new trilogy in the future. According to Comicbook, this is what apparently vexes Ben Affleck, he is concerned and understands the potential for epic failure.
“I’m in full-on, trying-to-get-it-right mode [for Batman]. It’s not the kind of movie that you can fail quietly at. [I] have to be sure I have something I feel really confident about before we go forward.”
Ben Affleck said he is in “full-on-get-it-right mode,” and as well he should be. Batman has had a pretty rough history, as far as comic book adaptation go. In all fairness, though, he is one of the most adapted character over the years. Not to mention the need he will have to manage fan opinion and potential backlash. It is fair to say that Batman fans are always deeply divided in their opinions.
Batman ’66, starring Adam West, is consider a classic. However, many found it campy and not a very good representation of the character. Tim Buron’s Batman films are given high praise, but some loathe them. Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight trilogy also had its ups and downs, depending on the film, and how growly Christian Bale was in the batsuit.
Affleck had the benefit of his Batman working alongside Superman in Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice and The Flash, Wonderwoman, Aquaman, and Cyborg as well in Justice League. When Ben Affleck ventures out on his own to director and star in a Batman trilogy, it will be all on him. To Ben Affleck’s advantage, many might say, Batman does best on his own.
Keeping Up With The Joneses is a blasé “spycom” reminiscent of the piffle released at the beginning of the year, which makes the timing of this release incredibly surprising. While the star power behind this film does indeed turn heads (Zach Galifianakis, Isla Fisher, Gal Gadot, and Jon Hamm), their collective performances give no reason for anyone to rush to their theaters this weekend. Keep Up With The Joneses …. Nah, I’m good, thanks.
The film centers around Jeff and Karen Gaffney (Zach Galifianakis and Isla Fisher) an uber sweet married couple living the American dream in generic suburbia. The neighborhood is abuzz when word gets out that they are getting new neighbors, Tim and Natalie Jones (Jon Hamm and Gal Gadot), and they are excited to move into their new house, which they paid cash for (odd). From the first moment they move in, something isn’t right about these new neighbors. Tim is apparently a travel writer who loves to blow glass as a hobby. Natalie has a cooking blog that has garnered her some notoriety. However, at night they seem always to be up to something. Jeff always gives people the benefit of the doubt, but Karen knows that they are no good and takes to spying on them.
Of course, we find out through a series of “wacky” (and I use that term loosely) events that involve one of the Gaffney’s being shot with a sleeping dart, that Karen’s suspicions are correct and the Joneses are spies for the United States Government. Now I don’t want to ruin the rest of a totally dynamic and compelling plot, but we also learn that only the Gaffney’s can help make the Joneses mission a successful one. Because of course.
One of the many puzzling elements of the film is why Zach Galifianakis is cast as the lead. It’s a struggle even to come up with an example of a film where he was the male lead and the movie did well. He rose to fame in the Hangover trilogy, but that was a perfectly calibrated, weird supporting role. Galifianakis flourishes in those types of roles where he uses his comedic talents and doesn’t have the burden of carrying the film. His performance in this film is oddly stilted. All he’s doing is playing the same goofy male lead that we’ve seen in any number of romcoms.
While we are at it, What happened to Jon Hamm’s movie career? Hamm is a fantastic actor who gained fame/notoriety for his work on Mad Men, and now he’s stuck in films opposite a guy who claims to fame is that he played the weird brother in the Hangover. He’s woefully miscast in this “Spycom” which requires him to have some chemistry with Galifianakis, and it’s nonexistent throughout the film. Hamm should be the leading man in most dramas and even the right kind of action film. Instead, we are forced to watch Hamm try his hand at comedy. Sorry … no thanks.
This film typifies the current slate of new releases. Nothing exciting enough to compel anyone to your local theater. Just a big barrell of nothing. With November fast approaching, let’s hope for better releases on the horizon.
The Final Girl has been a fabric in the tapestry of horror cinema for as long as slashers and stalkers have been killing oversexed teenagers. It’s a common trope in horror cinema, still used today in just about every other horror film, and throughout the years the Final Girl has not only kicked off a franchise, it’s kickstarted careers.
The idea of one last girl, usually virginal and innocent and ultimately independent, has often been a way for the audience to identify with the characters in a horror movie. As Carol J. Clover points out in her book, Men, Women and Chainsaws: Gender in The Modern Horror Film, the audience begins these films seeing things from the side of the killer or killers; before long, a strong female survivor begins to emerge, and the audience perspective shifts to their plight and ultimate defeat of whatever evil that’s in front of them.
And there have been some terrific Final Girls. Despite sharing so many traits, the best Final Girls manage to fit inside a box of identifiers while simultaneously forging their own path to freedom. Their escapes from the clutches of evil are often as iconic as the evil in question, their character sometimes just as impactful on pop culture as their adversary. We salute you, Final Girl, and we celebrate these five legends in the slasher-stopping business…
5. Nancy Thompson, A Nightmare on Elm Street – Heather Langenkamp got the rare (and by rare I mean only) opportunity to play The Final Girl both as her character, Nancy, and as herself in Wes Craven’s meta New Nightmare a decade later. Langenkamp isn’t the greatest actress no matter who she’s playing, but she fits here if by no other reason than she’s the one who got the gig.
Nancy stands out from so many Final Girls in that her sexuality, while incomparable to her poor friend Tina who gets sliced and diced on the ceiling, is not nearly as bottled up as those who came before and after her. Her sexuality is noticeable, at least more so than other survivors in these films, and she has a sharp edge to her persona to match the razor-handed Freddy Krueger.
4. Sally Hardesty, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre – A few years before Jamie Lee Curtis gave a definite identity to The Final Girl, Marilyn Burns gave us what is still the most underrated final girl in slasher cinema history. And it’s hard to believe, because poor Sally has to endure, arguably, more pure insanity than anyone else on this list.
Both Sally and her friend, Pam, are on this trip with their boyfriends, so virginal virtues are probably out the window here. However, what gives Sally the sympathetic advantage over her doomed friends is the fact she’s saddled with Franklin, her pathetic invalid brother who we all can’t wait to see split in half by Leatherface. Sally is tortured at that iconic dinner scene, and sacrifices her body to escape more than just about any other Final Girl in cinematic history. And her last scene, at day break in the back of that truck, laughing maniacally, is one of the most impactful moments of pure madness in horror movie history.
3. Sidney Prescott, Scream – There were technically two Final Girls in Wes Craven’s horror deconstruction classic. But Gale Weathers doesn’t fit the traditional Final Girl trope. She has Dewey, she’s an outsider in this world of slasher victims, and she isn’t the icon of the franchise the way Neve Campbell’s sweet, virginal Sydney is.
Campbell is set up to be the Final Girl from the beginning, transforming from innocent girl next door to determined, vengeful enforcer – somewhere in those scenes after she lost her virginity, if we’re keeping up with what Craven is doing here. Campbell’s Prescott also got to be the Final Girl a few more times, in sequels of increasingly diminishing quality. And she got to be the last chick standing in all of the Scream films, an award shared with only one more: the next person on this list.
2. Ellen Ripley, Alien – True, there are those AvP films where Ellen Ripley wasn’t the last one to show down with acid-spewing Xenomorphs. But nobody cares about those, let’s be honest. Sigourney Weaver’s Ellen Ripley has no sexuality, really, save for a few scantily-clad shots in the original Alien. She’s more concerned with destroying these creatures, she has no time for sex.
And that’s the unique thing about Ripley and her relationship with the killer stalking her. She has no complicated tie to the Xenomorph. She was just there when it infiltrated the Nostromo, and she is motivated by nothing more than pure, unadulterated hatred for the alien. She wants to destroy it, and she succeeds time and time again.
1. Laurie Strode, Halloween – Despite the fact that Sally was before her, and the true original Final Girl was Jesse Bradford (Olivia Hussey) in Black Christmas, it was Jamie Lee Curtis’s Laurie Strode who, from top to bottom, defined The Final Girl forever.
Laurie Strode is sweet, innocent, a little nerdy, and loyal to her friends. She’s stuck babysitting these kids while her friend is busy hooking up across the street. Now she does smoke a little pot earlier int he day, before Michael Myers begins slicing throats, but hey this is the 70s. Everyone smoked pot in the movies. Regardless, Laurie’s evolution from innocent girl next door to true survivor is the overwhelming catalyst for John Carpenter’s classic.
Your next venture into the Jedi universe, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, will last exactly 133 minutes, or two hours and 13 minutes, according to Makingstarwars.net and Australia’s Event Cinema.
Provided no last-minute edits are made, Rogue One clocks in just five minutes shy of last December’s release of Star Wars: The Force Awakens.
Good, bad, or indifferent, this time mirrors the typical running times of every previous Star Wars movie – somewhere around the two-hour mark. Interestingly, Rogue One has the same run time as Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. Hopefully this one will be more satisfying.
Much of the plot is hush-hush, but it centers around Jyn Erso (Felicity Jones) and other Rebels in their quest to steal the blueprints to the Death Star. We already know how it ends, but that’s not why we plan to watch it. Would Titanic have made a bajillion dollars if the only awesome thing about it was the ship sinking? No. No it wouldn’t.
Joining Jones in the cast are Mads Mikkelson as Galen Erso, Forrest Whitaker as Saw Gerrra, Ben Mendelsohn as Orson Krennic, Diego Luna as Cassian Andor, Jimmy Smits as Bail Organa, and James Earl Jones as the respiratory voice of Darth Vader. Gareth Edwards directs, based on a screenplay by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy.
Rogue One: A Star Wars Story will hit theaters on December 16, 2016
Over the weekend, Tim Miller stepped away from directing the sequel to his 2016 über-hit, Deadpool, over creative differences with Deadpool himself, Ryan Reynolds. It is an amicable decision reached between Miller and 20th Century Fox. Now a petition is circulating on Change.org to snare Quentin Tarantino to take over director duties, according to Comicbook.com
The petition was created by Carl Champion, Jr., who is apparently a massive Deadpool and Tarantino fan. Just check out his mission statement:
“If there was ever a chance to see Tarantino do a project almost guaranteed to make a billion dollars, this is it. We got a great taste of what this could be like in Kill Bill, but imagine having a guy like Tarantino write dialogue for The Merc with the Mouth! It would be so glorious. Join me!”
This petition will be sent to Reynolds, who serves as a producer on the sequel. Reynolds was also instrumental in persuading 20th Century Fox to greenlight Deadpool in the first place. The goal is 1,000 signatures for the petition. As of this writing, Champion has amassed 744 John Hancocks.
It’s a fairly low probability of the petition achieving its end game. There are petitions for everything. But never say never; the first Deadpool was made due to an avalanche of support from fans and Reynolds. And Tarantino is an inspired choice. His penchant for violence and memorable dialogue lends itself perfectly to the Merc with the Mouth.
The script for Deadpool 2 is still being written by Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, so not much is know about the direction it will take. Rumors suggest the appearance of Deadpool’s time-hopping associate Cable, and his love interest, the mercenary Domino. While it’s known that Cable will appear in Logan, the last Wolverine movie, it isn’t clear if the actor playing Cable (Boyd Holbrook) will cross-over to reprise his role.
The first Deadpool opened on Valentine’s Day 2016 and was a massive hit for Reynolds and everyone involved. World wide box office gross for the movie totaled over $782 million, so expect the sequel to pull out every stop to top that
Alien: Covenant is still about nine months away, but we’re picking up hints of the film’s story here and there. We’re getting little looks at the film, little tidbits of information, and now it seems Michael Fassbender and a fan site are unpacking some plot and alien details.
Fassbender, who plays David, recently spoke to BBC radio and called the xenomorph characters “Neomorphs.” Makes perfect sense. As for these new versions of the H.R. Giger creature, AVP Galaxy has a ton of detailed information regarding the Neomorphs:
These Aliens are the result of the local ecosystem being mutated by the accelerant/black goo. Over time, pods started to grow on the trees and the ground, and release a spore when disturbed… These spores infect several members of the Covenant crew by entering the body through the ear and nostrils. The spores cause the growth of the Neomorphs inside the infected hosts – something that is reminiscent of William Gibson’s first draft of Alien 3. One of the Neomorphs bursts from the back of one of the infected crew, a “backburster”. The other crewmember’s Neomorph erupts through their throat.
AVP Galaxy is usually pretty on point when it comes to Alien (and Predator) news. They might be off on a few details, but I doubt it. Alien: Covenant opens August 4 next year, but I imagine we’ll have a look at these Neomorphs somewhere along the road to August 4.
The Walking Dead Season 7 Premiere: All the reviews are (mostly) saying the same thing…
I had to do it. I had to see if the reviews on The Walking Dead matched my own thoughts. Turns out they did. The season premiere comes month’s after the season 6 cliffhanger finale, which was not well-received overall. In fact, season six reviews often bemoaned the use of gimmicks and lack of character development. Additionally, season six was marred by the fact that many viewers already had the inside track on Negan and had to endure the slow-burn of episodes making viewers wait for the appearance of Negan.
Off-season rumors and comic-con info dumps setup the entire Walking Dead community for the impending death of a fan favorite character. Of course, the comic books set it up far earlier. Many expected Glenn to be killed in S6 or S7, and if you are reading this, you know it’s Glenn that was killed by Negan, as well as Abraham.
First, it’s clear that Ramsay Bolton has dropped to #2 in the TV sadist power-rankings. The deaths of Abraham and Glenn were brutal, and overly sadistic.
Second, the whole premiere was dragged out in a way that just wasn’t entertaining. Few liked this episode and it made you question the value in watching the show.
And why wouldn’t it? Where is this show going? There’s no end game. No real plan. If you want to call Alexandria a plan, that’s OK but it’s really the same story as the “prison community” from a few seasons back. Nothing really new in Alexandria, it’s just our band of survivors wandering from threat-to-shelter yet again. If the writer’s goal is to demonstrate to the viewers that humanity can fall so far from compassion and cooperation in the face of an apocalypse, you did your job the first few times around. All we get is humanity falling farther into the abyss each season. That notion stalls after a while. We get it already.
So you went and bashed in Glenn’s skull. It was a bit on the nose. Abraham was the setup man that got you thinking that our favorites might sneak past the gate. Nope, not to be. As much as I like Jeffrey Dean Morgan’s acting (and it was outstanding), the character is a boor. Says the word ‘shit’ too much. Grins too much. Monologues too much. I guess that’s the true nature of the character as originally written, but he came off as more of a friggin’ goon than anything else. The whole stand-around-watch-and-photograph group of Saviors also seemed awkward. We get it Negan, “yer the man”.
Overall, the season 7 premiere left me in the same place I’ve been for a while with The Walking Dead – with the question of “why am I watching this?”
But don’t take my word for it. Here’s what other reviewers are saying ‘round the innerwebs…
NY Times – NEGATIVE
CNN – MIXED
IGN – NEGATIVE
Forbes – MOSTLY NEGATIVE
Paste Magazine – MOSTLY NEGATIVE
Screencrush –NEGATIVE
IndieWire –NEGATIVE
Digital Spy – MIXED
Independent UK – POSITIVE
Inquistr – POSITIVE
AV Club Review –NEGATIVE
Comicbook.com – POSITIVE
Monkeys Fighting Robots -NEGATIVE
As always, comments are welcome, especially when it comes to The Walking Dead.
Quotes from Reviews
Monkeys Fighting Robots – “The Walking Dead clearly knows what it should be focusing on, but can’t actually do it. Many elements of good television are there, but they are improperly utilized. Negan takes too long to talk a big, evil game, but all he delivers is a silver lining to a disappointing premiere”
IndieWire – “It was miserable, and tedious, and made me feel bad. Not in an emotionally compelling way, just in a “I could be watching something of value” way. Who needs this shit?” Grade: D-
IGN.com – The Verdict: Walking Dead’s Season 7 premiere was an uncomfortable crawl through broken glass, with an escalating sense of cruelty that never let up until the survivors were left on the road to scoop up their loved ones’ carcasses. Morgan’s Negan provided some moments of levity (if you could even consider it that) and the big second death was a shocker, but you want to leave an episode feeling shaken and riveted, not numb and in need of a shower.
Forbes – “All told, it was a tense, upsetting season premiere. As much as I hate the long cliff-hanger, and as much as I hate to see Glenn go, I can’t deny that this is the most intense, insane and emotionally powerful episode The Walking Dead has given us in years. I’m still not sure how to feel about Negan. Jeffrey Dean Morgan is so flippant, so casual in his villainy, he almost seems out of place. Whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing remains to be seen. Whether this is merely Governor 2.0 remains to be seen. Still, I’m experiencing something that was in short supply by the end of Season 6: Excitement.”
Paste Magazine – “I’m so annoyed by this entire stupid episode, Josh. I wish I could be a little more positive, or see something redeeming in it, but it was just so so bad and I’m glad it’s over. Here are a few ways that it totally and completely sucked.”
Screencrush – “There’s only one question The Walking Dead Season 7 needed to answer off the bat, and it wasn’t Negan’s victim. It would take a major swing to justify such a cheap, manipulative cliffhanger as the one that ended Season 6, so was it worth it? Profoundly not.”
NY Times – “So more than six months after it was posed, the “who” question has now been answered, allowing us to consider the natural follow-up: Was it worth the wait, as Mr. Kirkman promised it would be? I’m going with ‘nope.’ For one thing, as noted earlier, I saw no compelling reason the cliffhanger device was necessary. For another, this was not a good episode. “
Digital Spy – “We don’t know what we were expecting really. It was never going to be a pleasant hour of television. But when it came to it, it kinda felt like an Eli Roth-directed collection of torture porn, Saw style. We’ve seen shocking deaths on The Walking Dead before, but this felt different. Yes, this is The Walking Dead – it’s not Downton Abbey. But it just felt needlessly grim and mean-spirited. We need a bath now… Tonight’s episode felt like a long prelude to the actual season, and we can’t wait.”
CNN – “The Walking Dead still has a strong array of assets, and its willingness to jettison important players has been vital in keeping the storytelling unpredictable and evolving. Those who have stuck with the show since the beginning will still find plenty to like about it, and AMC has every reason to continue mining its huge footprint in the cultural zeitgeist. Nevertheless, its most admirable qualities have increasingly been overshadowed by its more distasteful ones — not merely in demonstrating just how brutal humanity can be, but by toying with its audience, dangling plot twists the way somebody plays with a kitten. “
Inquistr – Final Verdict: “The Day Will Come Where You Won’t Be” gets a 10/10 from The Inquisitr.
Independent UK – “It may be difficult to muster excitement for something this depraved, but after six seasons – and a boldly stoic opener to season 7 – it remains easy to place your trust in the hands of showrunner Scott M. Gimple who is clearly elevating this immensely popular show’s strength with each new episode. Okay, the prevalent feeling may be of despair – but just be relieved it’s not at the state of the zombie series’ quality.”
AV Club – “This is how stupid the show has become: after six seasons of endless death, after years of repeatedly reminding us that anyone* (*who isn’t Rick or Carl) can die, after going through the same “We have hope now! Oh, look, it’s death” cycle over and over and over again without any real variation or insight, it still expects us to care when it trots out the same trick again.”
AC Club Community Rating > C-
Comicbook.com – “The execution of the episode (directed by executive producer Greg Nicotero) was nothing short of brilliant… It was a very impressive feat by AMC and the team to keep the spoilers home, for the most part, in an age where fans are constantly seeking for instant gratification.”
WARNING: SPOILERS FOR ‘THE WALKING DEAD’ S07E01, ‘The Day Will Come When You Won’t Be’
The day has finally come. Fans of The Walking Dead have been anxiously awaiting the return of the show. Theories and spoilers flew left and right, as people tried to decipher last season’s cliffhanger ending. And now, ‘The Day Will Come When You Won’t Be’ has aired on AMC. The premiere caused shock and awe amongst many fans, as the show reveals the deaths. We were finally exposed to the true villainy of Jeffrey Dean Morgan’s sadistic Negan. However, despite all of this, the show failed in one crucial way. With all the elements of a good episode, The Walking Dead somehow found a way to make nothing work the way it should.
Many people have been comparing this episode to the infamous Game of Thrones “Red Wedding” episode. This comparison doesn’t work, however, because these deaths are not the episode’s high point. It is shocking to see such big names die, make no mistake. But the season six cliffhanger blew the potential shock & surprise of the reveal. Since then, many people have theorized who Negan took the life of (including us here at MFR). The cliffhanger took the steam out of the shock, making the deaths more about confirming fan theories. Game of Thrones made the Red Wedding work because it came out of nowhere, made sense in the plot, and had several contained deaths. The Walking Dead missed its opportunity to make these deaths memorable, opting instead for the cliffhanger, and therefore crippled itself for this episode.
For better or for worse, the characters that died – AND HERE IS THE SPOILER, FOLKS – were Abraham and Glenn. Now to be fair, Abraham is a relatively strong choice. He wasn’t major enough to justify such a huge cliffhanger, by any means. However, his arc was coming to a natural conclusion, and so his death felt well deserved. The death of Glenn, on the other hand, could only be justified by the events of the comics. Glenn’s death has been teased so often over the years, notably with the dumpster last season. He was a central character, with a root in the show’s primary action, and a baby on the way. Glenn’s death, like the deaths of many The Walking Dead characters, is an attention-grabber first and foremost. When it comes to good storytelling, it’s one of the weakest decisions the show could make.
We can’t properly discuss the big deaths without bringing up their perpetrator. Negan has cemented himself in the show’s universe, for better or worse. He’s all action, no reason, and it works – but only to a degree. In such a savage, violent world, no character has matched the world’s ruthlessness until now. Even characters like The Governor or Dawn had a rhyme or reason to them. All Negan knows is violence and cruelty, and he has the power in this new world. The reason that it works is the only reason to Negan is his thirst for power. He is intent on ruling the new world, and that involves leaning into the madness. He’s done what Rick has constantly come close to doing, and makes Negan the perfect rival. Not to say Negan is perfect in this episode, but he is a shining star.
Unfortunately, where Negan shines, Rick falls flat. Rick has been one of the few constants in The Walking Dead, so it makes sense we’d spend so much time on him this episode. We want to see how he reacts to these deaths, and what comes next. We see glimpses of this development for Rick, but the show never gets it right. Seeing every group member die in his mind (which further explains why they filmed all those death scenes) worked as a moment. But beyond that, The Walking Dead challenged Rick’s role at every turn. Daryl inciting Glenn’s execution took away Rick’s agency. Carl giving Rick his blessing to chop his arm off lessened that moment’s impact. Rick is supposed to be an engaging anchor and protagonist. But the show fails Rick by making him too inconsequential.
On top of these weak principal character choices, the side characters are rendered useless. Maggie, for the umpteenth time, is reduced to a mourner, with a cry that weakens after so many deaths in the family. So many characters are clearly meant to matter – Aaron, Rosita, even Sasha – but in the wake of all this, their irrelevance is quadrupled. They exist to give The Walking Dead a potential ratings boost, and nothing more. You can show me whatever stupid dinner table fantasy you want. It doesn’t change the fact that the show has never bothered to properly define characters, and never will. That’s why these deaths don’t matter – because The Walking Dead has no patience to put in the necessary legwork. And considering how much of this show is spent walking around the woods, that’s really saying something.
It might seem outlandish to throw such hate on this episode. The hype online about it has been never-ending since it aired. It’s understandable hype, but all that The Walking Dead provides in this is relative relief from the unknown. The biggest problem with this episode is that it’s too little, too late. This extremely dark tone is new and interesting, but much like Negan himself, it’s too messy in execution. The reason this type of death works for Game of Thrones is how the deaths are consistently handled with care. Everything about this episode focuses on garnering views – and from a business perspective, this episode is an assured success.
The Walking Dead clearly knows what it should be focusing on, but can’t actually do it. Many elements of good television are there, but they are improperly utilized. Negan takes too long to talk a big, evil game, but all he delivers is a silver lining to a disappointing premiere. The show tries to throw its grittiness and sadness into your face, hoping it distracts from the absence of quality.All The Walking Dead knows how to do is pretend like these deaths matter. But without proper emotional stakes, character motivation, pacing – or even the general rules of television storytelling – it flounders for a reaction from the masses.
(And just to wrap this up, how did the hatchet end up on the roof, exactly? Negan threw it out the door of the RV – OUT, not UP – and it ends up on the roof? How the Hell does that make any sense? GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER, KIRKMAN).