AMC announced Friday afternoon that The Walking Dead would return for a seventh season. The October 25th cliffhanger of an episode brought 18.2 million viewers to the table. The network also renewed The Talking Dead.
We are so proud to share these shows with fans who have been so passionate, communicative and engaged,” said Charlie Collier, president of AMC, SundanceTV and AMC Studios today. “We are grateful for and continually impressed by the talent, effort and excellence on continuous display by Robert Kirkman, Scott Gimple, Chris Hardwick and the many people with whom we partner to make these unique shows possible. The result: More Walking and Talking. Hooray.”
The Walking Dead universe was rocked last Sunday night as it looked like Glenn, played Steven Yeun appeared to be eaten alive by the walkers! Social media exploded with reaction and theories about Glenn, and if there was a chance that he survived. One person has been strangely missing on social media, Yeun didn’t appear on Talking Dead after show and the last time he posted to his Twitter account was just before the episode.
A few of Yeun’s costars have tweeted, but not much information to speculate a theory.
Sony Pictures released the first teaser for The Brothers Grimsby Friday morning. The film stars Sacha Baron Cohen as an obnoxious soccer hooligan brother who must go on the run with his estranged brother, an elite black-ops agent (played by Mark Strong). Louis Leterrier who directed Unleashed, The Incredible Hulk, Now You See Me, The Transporter, Clash of the Titans; directs Phil Johnston, Peter Baynham, and Cohen’s screenplay.
The Brothers Grimsby will be in theaters on March 4, 2016.
The new trailer for Angelina Jolie’s By The Sea, starring both her and husband Brad Pitt, is absent of dialogue but it makes up for it in steep melodrama.
Here is the trailer:
And here is the official synopsis:
By the Sea follows an American writer named Roland (Pitt) and his wife, Vanessa (Jolie Pitt), who arrive in a tranquil and picturesque seaside resort in 1970s France, their marriage in apparent crisis. As they spend time with fellow travelers, including young newlyweds Lea (Laurent) and François (Poupaud), and village locals Michel (Arestrup) and Patrice (Bohringer), the couple begins to come to terms with unresolved issues in their own lives.
By the Sea looks incredible depressing and difficult to handle, but I enjoy those emotionally overwrought films if they’re done well. Jolie appears to be channeling classic foreign filmmakers – there is a hint of Bertolucci here, especially with the old Universal logo – and the main draw will be seeing her with her hubby in such an intense film. It hits theaters November 13.
Our Brand is Crisis ambitiously attempts to balance political satire, character drama, and comedy, and the results are decidedly mixed. Yes, there’s fun to be had here watching Sandra Bullock and Billy Bob Thornton’s characters match wits as rival political strategists on opposite sides of a heated presidential election, pulling one underhanded, manipulative move after the next to undermine one another and deliver their candidates the election. But the film’s characters feel entirely too stock, and as a whole the plot’s progression is far too predictable — you know more or less where the film is going from start to finish, which robs it of any meaningful impact. Is it terrible? No. But the talent involved here is capable of far better.
Bullock plays Jane Bodine, who at the start of the film has voluntarily retired from her one-time rock star career as a highly sought-after political campaign consultant. Despite her having been away from the game for six years, she finds herself courted by an American management team in the employ of Castillo (Joaquim de Almeida), a Bolivian presidential candidate badly lagging in the nation’s polls, hoping her insight and tactics can help them turn the election around. Unimpressed by the challenge, Jane only agrees to join the team once she learns that her old professional nemesis, Pat Candy (Thornton), who ran the opposition during her last disastrous campaign, the one that sent her into self-imposed exile and in which she earned the nickname “Calamity Jane”, is in Bolivia as a consultant to the current front-runner’s campaign.
Once in country, Jane finds herself equally unimpressed by Castillo, who with his wealth, power, and spotty history in the nation’s politics seems ill-equipped to appeal to an electorate clamoring for populist polices such as wealth redistribution and more balanced ethnic representation in the government. It’s only when Candy, all soft-spoken smarm and sly innuendo, starts going out of his way to psyche her out that she wakes up and gets in the game, declaring to Castillo and the team that they’re at war and that its time they get their hands dirty.
Jane’s tactics, which include negative TV attack and print ads, leaked misinformation to parties both in and out of the country with interests in the election’s outcome, and even outright sabotage of the front-runner’s campaign events, are all plays that come straight from the same playbook that Candy’s tactics do. They’re sneaky, manipulative, and borderline illegal, but they’re effective, and soon they start getting results. But even as Castillo’s poll numbers climb and Jane sees Candy and his client start to sweat, something still doesn’t feel right. She feels it the most when she looks at Eddie (Reynaldo Pacheco), a young volunteer in Castillo’s campaign office, who sees none of what Jane sees in their candidate and fully believes in him as someone who can truly lead the nation to prosperity. For Eddie, it’s about faith in Castillo and hope for his people, while for Jane it’s about beating Candy, no matter what that may mean for the people who have to live with Castillo as their president. Or, at least, that’s what it would have been all about for Jane before “Calamity.” Now, in the wake of past failures and seeing in Candy’s work the things she’s come to hate about herself? Maybe it might become about something else for Jane, after all.
Our Brand is Crisis is actually a remake of sorts — the film’s fictional characters and plot were “suggested by” a 2005 documentary of the same name which covered the participation of American political strategists in a real-life Bolivian presidential campaigns during an election in 2002. But even if that weren’t the case, and this new film as it is was a wholly original political satire, its themes and elements of satire would certainly still feel familiar to American audiences. After all, the power of focus group-influenced advertising, smear campaigns, negativity, misinformation, the dastardly lengths political image consultants will go to in order to make at times the most unlikable politicians likable, or at least simply electable, is certainly nothing 21st Century America hasn’t seen before. Thus, the tactics employed by Jane Bodine and Pat Candy in this film, while occasionally subversively funny in and of themselves, aren’t likely to take anyone by surprise. It’s just American politics as usual, just put into practice in arguably the worst possible place, a nation on the brink of revolution and desperately in need of fundamental change.
It falls then to the leads to give audiences something worth their while, something nuance and depth to the characters at the heart of Our Brand is Crisis to make the film a worthwhile experience, and here they’re only partly successful because they’re hamstrung by a thin script. For her part, Bullock gives it her all, projecting vulnerability, self-loathing, and fragility even when Jane’s calling the shots and doing what she does best. The haunted look in her eyes is reminiscent of what she gave us in Gravity, and it draws you in, even if you can sense the direction in which her character arc is heading. Thornton does his best with what he’s given, and as Candy he’s a likable presence sparring with Jane, even when what Candy’s doing and saying is downright awful. But unfortunately he, like all the other supporting players here such as Anthony Mackie (Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Avengers: Age of Ultron), Scoot McNairy (Gone Girl, Argo), and Joaquim de Almeida (Fast Five, Desperado), is tasked with working with what is essentially a one-note character. Their sole function, though they accomplish it in different ways, seems to be to serve as foils to Jane. That they do, but that’s not enough to make them interesting or compelling.
As for the “comedy” in Our Brand is Crisis, it’s few and far between, and a great deal of it either springs from the aforementioned political satire or the pranks and mind games Jane and Candy play on and with one another in the course of the campaign. It’s in the sequences involving the pranks that Bullock, always so good with physical comedy on the occasions she’s had to run with it, manages to inject some maniac fun into the otherwise super-serious proceedings. Watch for a particularly fun scene involving an impromptu bus race along a narrow mountain road that’s almost as scary as it is funny. The only way it could have been more entertaining was if Bullock had reached back to her Speed days and taken the wheel herself. It’s too bad there wasn’t more of this type of material in the film — yes, it may have dulled the impact of the film’s satire or further muddied its tone, but then again, it might have helped by adding an element of the unexpected to balance out the otherwise “been there, seen that” feel of the political and personal dramas that make up the balance of the running time.
Our Brand is Crisis
Starring Sandra Bullock, Billy Bob Thornton, Anthony Mackie, Joaquim de Almeida, Ann Dowd, Scoot McNairy, Zoe Kazan, and Raynaldo Pacheco. Directed by David Gordon Green.
Running Time: 107 minutes
Rated R for language including some sexual references.
Sakurako-san episode 4 tries something new this week, and it pays off immensely, so far anyway.
Spoilers
Rather than a single episodic story, episode four of Sakurako-san is the first half a two-part mini-arc, and it was far better than the previous episodes.
My theory as to why this episode was better than those that went before it is due to how much build up there was. The biggest flaw with the other episodes was the focus on Sakurako explaining everything. The reason episode two was the best episode, until now that is, was because there was a lot more build up than the other two episodes.
Ooh, such an ominous shot. Surely it doesn’t mean that he’s secretly bad, right? Right?
This episode was nothing but build up. The entire episode was nothing but a set up for the conclusion coming next week, this slower pace really helped the show as a whole. It allowed the atmosphere to develop, and the hints we got were greater in number, but smaller and subtler, something Sakurako-san hasn’t done up till now.
Perhaps the greatest strength this episode had been its unique set up, unlike the previous Sakurako-san episodes this mystery doesn’t involve a corpse or bones. This move simultaneously gives us a break from its gimmick and shows us that Sakurako-san can and will go beyond what it’s comfortable with.
The only question that remains is the quality of next week’s episode. By far the weakest aspect of this show is the explanations from Sakurako, and if this episode was all build up, it’s likely that next week will be all explanation. However, this episode has built up enough good faith for me to give next week the benefit of the doubt.
You know, cop or not, that guy is pretty annoying.
That said, this episode still hasn’t reached the level of a great episode. While it’s far better than it’s peers (the other Sakurako-san episodes) it wasn’t good enough to overcome the previous episodes. So, while I look forward to next week, I still wouldn’t recommend this show to anyone yet, I can only hope that over the next few weeks the quality will continue to improve, and we might have a good show on our hands by the end of it.
WARNING: MASSIVE SPOILERS FOR DARK KNIGHT III: THE MASTER RACE BELOW
In an interview with the French news site Le Monde, Frank Miller discussed the plot to his upcoming Dark Knight III: The Master Race. Miller says that the story’s chief antagonists will be the people of Kandor, the shrunken Kryptonian city kept by Superman in his Fortress of Solitude. In Miller’s story, Batman frees one million Kandorian citizens – and must then join forces with Superman and the other surviving members of the Justice League to prevent the conquest of Earth by this Master Race of Kryptonians. Miller says that while Batman has defeated Superman before, this time he will be facing “millions as strong as Superman…but if we had to bet, I would bet on Batman.”
Meanwhile, in a separate interview with Comic Book Resources, DKIII’s co-writer Brian Azzarello and illustrator Andy Kubert revealed that it isn’t Bruce Wayne behind the mask, but someone else. “Batman” is in fact Carrie Kelley, the Robin first introduced in Miller’s original Dark Knight Returns miniseries, who has taken over for Wayne after his death. Whether Bruce Wayne is really dead remains to be seen, but is unlikely given Miller’s comments.
Dark Knight III: The Master Race #1 arrives in comic shops on November 25.
The stories surrounding the production of Alejandro G. Iñárritu’s upcoming period thriller The Revenant are as compelling as the intense trailers. The shoot itself is a growing legend almost daily, with stories of desperate times and Leonardo DiCaprio sleeping inside a dead carcass to prep for his role as a man left for dead in the wilderness.
DiCaprio’s co-star, and everyone’s favorite new cinematic tough guy, Tom Hardy, recently spoke to Entertainment Weekly about filming, and said he and Iñárritu got into a wrestling match behind the scenes:
“When things get a bit too serious, I go, ‘Why don’t we have a cuddle in front of all these people here?’ It ends with both of us falling down in the snow. I think that’s a good thing. If I’m the naughty boy for doing that, then I’d rather be the naughty boy and release that tension… He’s unlike any director I’ve ever worked with. He sees things how he sees them, so to give him back what he wants is quite an interesting experience. It could drive you f—ing nuts.”
Iñárrituresponded, saying “On the surface, he can look inaccessible or difficult. But he is just a beautiful human being. He’s incredibly sensitive and lovable.”
It’s a strange thing with Tom Hardy. He appears to butt heads with directors all the time, yet the directors love him for it. He isn’t difficult for difficulties sake, not someone like Val Kilmer necessarily. He’s doing it all in the name of creativity and bringing energy to the film and his role in particular. That’s why I dig the guy.
The Revenant hits theaters in a limited release on Christmas, then goes to wide release in early January 8.
The world of television is changing since viewers can now fast-forward through commercials the new revenue source for networks is “streaming rights.”
FOX has worked out a deal with Amazon Prime Instant Video for the streaming rights to Lucifer. Amazon will be able to stream the new series in the UK shortly after the show airs in the United States. Check out the new Amazon trailer.
Lucifer is coming to FOX in January 2016.
Based upon the characters created by Neil Gaiman, Sam Kieth and Mike Dringenberg for DC Entertainment’s Vertigo imprint, LUCIFER is the story of the original fallen angel. Bored and unhappy as the Lord of Hell, LUCIFER MORNINGSTAR (Tom Ellis, “Merlin”) has abandoned his throne and retired to L.A., where he owns Lux, an upscale nightclub.
Charming, charismatic and devilishly handsome, Lucifer is enjoying his retirement, indulging in a few of his favorite things – wine, women, and song – when a beautiful pop star is brutally murdered outside of Lux. For the first time in roughly 10 billion years, he feels something awaken deep within him as a result of this murder. Compassion? Sympathy? The very thought disturbs him – as well as his best friend and confidante, MAZIKEEN aka MAZE (Lesley-Ann Brandt, “The Librarians”), a fierce demon in the form of a beautiful young woman.
The murder attracts the attention of LAPD homicide detective CHLOE DANCER (Lauren German, “Chicago Fire”), who initially is dismissive of Lucifer. But she becomes intrigued by his talent for drawing out people’s secrets and his desire to dispense justice, doling out punishment to those who deserve it. As they work together to solve the pop star’s murder, Lucifer is struck by Chloe’s inherent goodness. Accustomed to dealing with the absolute worst of humanity, Lucifer is intrigued by Chloe’s apparent purity and begins to wonder if there’s hope for his own soul yet.
At the same time, God’s emissary, the angel AMENADIEL (DB Woodside, “Suits,” “24”), has been sent to Los Angeles to convince Lucifer to return to the underworld…can the Devil incarnate be tempted toward the side of Good, or will his original calling pull him back toward Evil?
Tom Kapinos (“Californication”) wrote and executive-produced the pilot.
The second season of iZombie loves a few certain things. Sympathetic villains, over the top personas, and torturing Major. So what happens when the first two are ignored and a focus is put on the third? We get an okay episode.
Spoilers
I guess it wasn’t a bad episode, it’s better than last weeks in just about every way, but it wasn’t a very memorable episode either. Unlike the previous episode, which was either really high or really low in terms of quality, this episode was a flat line ‘eh’.
The seasons plotlines got a bit of development, Peyton’s working on hunting down ‘Mr. Boss’ with little success for the most part. Blaine’s having trouble getting the special Utopium from the guy that cut it. Liv and Major’s relationship ended and then started again. Peyton made friends with Blaine. Gilda and Major hooked up. Quite a bit happened, but not much of it was very compelling.
That said, a new character was introduced (an FBI agent stepping in on the local police’s turf, how original) and she was a blast. With a wonderful balance of snark and intelligence, every minute she was on-screen was an enjoyable minute. While her character was loads of fun, we have yet to see her impact on the story, and more specially the Major. Regardless, I cannot wait to see what she has in store for us.
The episode’s mystery however was really disappointing. There were many twists and turns, and by the end it seemed like we had finally found our murderer, and he was one of these sympathetic villains season 2 is pretty fond of, but instead it turned out to be a random break in that turned lethal. Which, like last weeks as well, wasn’t very satisfying at all. The show tried to pass it off as being realistic, that not all murders have a great story behind them, but I’m watching a show about a zombie that solves crimes with her brain-visions, I didn’t come here for realism! I came for a good narrative story, which this was not.