<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Fargo&#8217; Season 3, Episode 3: &#8220;The Law of Non-Contradiction&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://monkeysfightingrobots.co/fargo-season-3-episode-3-the-law-of-non-contradiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://monkeysfightingrobots.co/fargo-season-3-episode-3-the-law-of-non-contradiction/</link>
	<description>Comic Book Review And Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joseph Rejent		</title>
		<link>https://monkeysfightingrobots.co/fargo-season-3-episode-3-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#comment-20647</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Rejent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://temp-monkeysfightingrobots-url.wpmudev.hostm/?p=76800#comment-20647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://monkeysfightingrobots.co/fargo-season-3-episode-3-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#comment-20645&quot;&gt;Matt Bjorklund&lt;/a&gt;.

Matt, I think that is absolutely brilliant analysis and I wish I thought of it myself!  I don&#039;t know that it allays my concerns, entirely, but you&#039;re right.  Considered in that context, there is a good deal more nuance there than I initially gave it credit for.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://monkeysfightingrobots.co/fargo-season-3-episode-3-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#comment-20645">Matt Bjorklund</a>.</p>
<p>Matt, I think that is absolutely brilliant analysis and I wish I thought of it myself!  I don&#8217;t know that it allays my concerns, entirely, but you&#8217;re right.  Considered in that context, there is a good deal more nuance there than I initially gave it credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Bjorklund		</title>
		<link>https://monkeysfightingrobots.co/fargo-season-3-episode-3-the-law-of-non-contradiction/#comment-20645</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Bjorklund]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 22:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://temp-monkeysfightingrobots-url.wpmudev.hostm/?p=76800#comment-20645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with your take on this episode, Joe. The connection you made between it and that short scene in the film between Marge and Mike is an astute observation. I never would have put that together, but it&#039;s spot-on. The one thing I&#039;d add to your analysis is in regard to how technology is portrayed. It seemed to me, and I could be misinterpreting this, that the animated sequences throughout the episode, which you touched on briefly regarding their connection to the Minsky device, delivered a very subtle and poignant metaphor. If you recall, the robot (Minsky) never really interacts with his surroundings other than as a passive observer, despite constantly expressing his will to &quot;help&quot;. If you interpret the robot as a metaphor for both modern technology and its effect on mankind, I believe those sequences amount to a more nuanced take on the subject than the less subtle examples you listed above. That&#039;s my two cents. Like I said, I could be wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your take on this episode, Joe. The connection you made between it and that short scene in the film between Marge and Mike is an astute observation. I never would have put that together, but it&#8217;s spot-on. The one thing I&#8217;d add to your analysis is in regard to how technology is portrayed. It seemed to me, and I could be misinterpreting this, that the animated sequences throughout the episode, which you touched on briefly regarding their connection to the Minsky device, delivered a very subtle and poignant metaphor. If you recall, the robot (Minsky) never really interacts with his surroundings other than as a passive observer, despite constantly expressing his will to &#8220;help&#8221;. If you interpret the robot as a metaphor for both modern technology and its effect on mankind, I believe those sequences amount to a more nuanced take on the subject than the less subtle examples you listed above. That&#8217;s my two cents. Like I said, I could be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
