Tom – I want to thank you for taking the time to read the review. Your math is a little off, but I respect your passion.

The writing of the book got a 3.5 out of 5, which translates to 70% or a C. Which is just passing in school.
The art, colors, and letter received a 4 out of 5, which translates to 80% or a B. This is an average score.
With a combined score of 3.9 out of 5 that translates to 78%, which is a C+. That’s not a good score for a mega-event book.

How we review comic books:
5.0 = A near-perfect comic; one of the year’s best. You’ll remember this issue for a long time.

4.0-4.9 = An excellent book that’s well worth your money. Has memorable moments, stunning art, and shows a real understanding of how comics work.

3.0-3.9 = A pretty good, middle-of-the-road comic. Maybe not worth your money unless you’re a big fan of the series/character.

2.0-2.9 = Meh, it’s fine. Below average. Not terrible, but ultimately forgettable.

1.0-1.9 = It’s bad. Maybe it has one or two redeeming qualities, but the bad very much outweighs the good. It’s not worth your time, let alone your money.

0.0-0.9 = A terrible, horrible, no good, very bad comic. Not worth your time, let alone your money. If this is your score, you probably shouldn’t bother reviewing the book.

JV – Colin gave the writing a 3.5 and art 4 out of 5 stars, that would come out to a 3.75 stars score. The score or the coloring and letters influenced the score by +.15

No sure what the right answer is but I do appreciate your feedback.